![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on null. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've never heard the term "nuclear crime", at least that I recall, and I'm tempted to think that the original author probably made it up. The assertion that it's the "best term" for these phenomena is dubious.
My original impulse was to put the article on AfD as a violation of WP:NEO, but there is a lot of good work here, and it would be a pity to waste it. On the other hand I don't think the article can stay at this title. My suggestion would be to refactor it into list format, and move it to list of crimes involving radioactive substances. Any other ideas? -- Trovatore 21:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
So as the IAEA have used the term, so I think we should stick with the term nuclear crime to label all criminal acts which involve the misuse of radioactive/nuclear materials and technology where the radioactive/nuclear aspects of the material are important. Cadmium
Does the detonation by the United States of nuclear devices over Japan not count as a crime because of its perpetration by a state actor? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaconway88 ( talk • contribs) 04:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I've deleted the entirely spurious reference to "isothiouronium" in the material on Radithor (I've also cleaned it from that page.) See Talk:Radithor for my explanation. Kay Dekker ( talk) 23:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
I've started cleaning up the article in the ways recommended in the recent AfD discussion. Any help is welcome! Catavar ( talk) 23:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
The inclusion of accidents that were also crimes seems redundant and not in the spirit of the article. We already have Nuclear_and_radiation_accidents, the benefit of this article is separating out cases in which radioactive substances were intentionally used to cause harm. If necessary, we can rename to "Intentional crimes involving radioactive substances" or "Non-accidental crimes involving radioactive substances" but I think that's needless pedantry. Catavar ( talk) 23:24, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Crimes involving radioactive substances. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Yasser Arafat's death is highly speculated (see Death of Yasser Arafat) to be a case of polonium poisoning. shouldn't this be added here as a speculated crime? SammyMajed ( talk) 07:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on null. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've never heard the term "nuclear crime", at least that I recall, and I'm tempted to think that the original author probably made it up. The assertion that it's the "best term" for these phenomena is dubious.
My original impulse was to put the article on AfD as a violation of WP:NEO, but there is a lot of good work here, and it would be a pity to waste it. On the other hand I don't think the article can stay at this title. My suggestion would be to refactor it into list format, and move it to list of crimes involving radioactive substances. Any other ideas? -- Trovatore 21:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
So as the IAEA have used the term, so I think we should stick with the term nuclear crime to label all criminal acts which involve the misuse of radioactive/nuclear materials and technology where the radioactive/nuclear aspects of the material are important. Cadmium
Does the detonation by the United States of nuclear devices over Japan not count as a crime because of its perpetration by a state actor? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaconway88 ( talk • contribs) 04:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I've deleted the entirely spurious reference to "isothiouronium" in the material on Radithor (I've also cleaned it from that page.) See Talk:Radithor for my explanation. Kay Dekker ( talk) 23:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
I've started cleaning up the article in the ways recommended in the recent AfD discussion. Any help is welcome! Catavar ( talk) 23:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
The inclusion of accidents that were also crimes seems redundant and not in the spirit of the article. We already have Nuclear_and_radiation_accidents, the benefit of this article is separating out cases in which radioactive substances were intentionally used to cause harm. If necessary, we can rename to "Intentional crimes involving radioactive substances" or "Non-accidental crimes involving radioactive substances" but I think that's needless pedantry. Catavar ( talk) 23:24, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Crimes involving radioactive substances. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Yasser Arafat's death is highly speculated (see Death of Yasser Arafat) to be a case of polonium poisoning. shouldn't this be added here as a speculated crime? SammyMajed ( talk) 07:08, 18 January 2017 (UTC)