![]() | Crested auklet has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
No time to add anything to the article, but this: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18662-seabird-evolved-head-feathers-as-sensory-device.html Jalwikip ( talk) 14:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I just added the new behavior section. I am new to wikipedia, so please let me know if you have suggestions! Samara levine ( talk) 06:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Samara. Good work on expanding the article. I can see that you added a lot since the previous edits! I think that the information content is good and the sequence of concepts was clear. I saw some areas of the article that required some grammatical changes, but nothing too major. I hyper-linked some of the scientific terms used that may confuse lay-men. I also added more headings to make the paragraphs more distinct in their content. There are some references (not the ones you added) that also need to be put into the correct format. I'm not sure which parts of the introduction each reference corresponds. GenesBrainsBehaviorNeuroscienceKL ( talk)
Great article! Well organized with lots of interesting details. I do have a couple of question--the sexy son and handicap hypothesis are grouped together, is that correct? Also, what is a "survival neutral ornament"? Otherwise, I only made grammatical edits and reworded some redundant and confusing sentences. Katheefwah ( talk) 01:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Samara! I like what you wrote and the content that you added, and was a little hesitant in changing anything without consultation. I believe that the order could use perhaps a bit more structuring. Perhaps you could place ornaments and such in a higher place near sexual selection or under runaway selection, seeing as the two highly relate. Either way, there may be a better way to integrate the ornaments into the prior sections. Under the "breeding" section, it may also be helpful to know the average litter size, whether it's restricted, etc. As of now, I have the impression that they produce one egg per mating season, but that's only because of what you put about parental care and high degrees of investment. I feel that normal browsers may not exactly understand this notion. ( Timothy Yung) TKYung ( talk) 02:19, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: FunkMonk ( talk · contribs) 12:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for taking the time to review the article! I'm sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you! I added more to this introduction section. I tried to follow the format seen in other Good Articles for the bird section. Please let me know if there is anything additional that you think should be added. Samara levine ( talk) 18:04, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- I added a taxonomy section. Please review. Samara levine ( talk) 18:23, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
I moved around this material. Please review Samara levine ( talk) 19:41, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
I added to the description section Samara levine ( talk) 19:41, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- I added some material in the habitat section regarding this. The original information was added by someone else, so I am only adding what I found from my sources. Samara levine ( talk) 20:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
My contributions have all been with in-line citations. I'm not sure how to deal with the references that I didn't add. Samara levine ( talk) 20:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
I didn't provide this reference. Should it be deleted? Samara levine ( talk) 20:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
* "This behavior has been described as underwater "flight"." Why?
That's much better. From my side, the article is looking good and I hope it will be accepted. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:35, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
This section should have more scientific information. It also needs some references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobiorower ( talk • contribs) 18:25, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
-Do you have any suggestions of where I could find such information? Or additional references? I've struggled finding additional sources for some of these categories. Samara levine ( talk) 15:47, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Crested auklet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
This article was the subject of an
educational assignment at Washington University supported by the
Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Fall term. Further details are available
on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
16:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Crested auklet has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
No time to add anything to the article, but this: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18662-seabird-evolved-head-feathers-as-sensory-device.html Jalwikip ( talk) 14:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I just added the new behavior section. I am new to wikipedia, so please let me know if you have suggestions! Samara levine ( talk) 06:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Samara. Good work on expanding the article. I can see that you added a lot since the previous edits! I think that the information content is good and the sequence of concepts was clear. I saw some areas of the article that required some grammatical changes, but nothing too major. I hyper-linked some of the scientific terms used that may confuse lay-men. I also added more headings to make the paragraphs more distinct in their content. There are some references (not the ones you added) that also need to be put into the correct format. I'm not sure which parts of the introduction each reference corresponds. GenesBrainsBehaviorNeuroscienceKL ( talk)
Great article! Well organized with lots of interesting details. I do have a couple of question--the sexy son and handicap hypothesis are grouped together, is that correct? Also, what is a "survival neutral ornament"? Otherwise, I only made grammatical edits and reworded some redundant and confusing sentences. Katheefwah ( talk) 01:56, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Hey Samara! I like what you wrote and the content that you added, and was a little hesitant in changing anything without consultation. I believe that the order could use perhaps a bit more structuring. Perhaps you could place ornaments and such in a higher place near sexual selection or under runaway selection, seeing as the two highly relate. Either way, there may be a better way to integrate the ornaments into the prior sections. Under the "breeding" section, it may also be helpful to know the average litter size, whether it's restricted, etc. As of now, I have the impression that they produce one egg per mating season, but that's only because of what you put about parental care and high degrees of investment. I feel that normal browsers may not exactly understand this notion. ( Timothy Yung) TKYung ( talk) 02:19, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: FunkMonk ( talk · contribs) 12:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for taking the time to review the article! I'm sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you! I added more to this introduction section. I tried to follow the format seen in other Good Articles for the bird section. Please let me know if there is anything additional that you think should be added. Samara levine ( talk) 18:04, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- I added a taxonomy section. Please review. Samara levine ( talk) 18:23, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
I moved around this material. Please review Samara levine ( talk) 19:41, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
I added to the description section Samara levine ( talk) 19:41, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
- I added some material in the habitat section regarding this. The original information was added by someone else, so I am only adding what I found from my sources. Samara levine ( talk) 20:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
My contributions have all been with in-line citations. I'm not sure how to deal with the references that I didn't add. Samara levine ( talk) 20:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
I didn't provide this reference. Should it be deleted? Samara levine ( talk) 20:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
* "This behavior has been described as underwater "flight"." Why?
That's much better. From my side, the article is looking good and I hope it will be accepted. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:35, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
This section should have more scientific information. It also needs some references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobiorower ( talk • contribs) 18:25, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
-Do you have any suggestions of where I could find such information? Or additional references? I've struggled finding additional sources for some of these categories. Samara levine ( talk) 15:47, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Crested auklet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 08:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
This article was the subject of an
educational assignment at Washington University supported by the
Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Fall term. Further details are available
on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
16:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)