This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merged from First Choice (pay-tv) page that I created weekend of 2006-07-01, as recommended by User:stickguy. What do I do with the original First Choice article? -- Jimj wpg 03:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Completed merge of First Choice (pay-tv) with this page (The Movie Network), as per advice from Uer:stickyguy. -- Jimj wpg 14:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
I recently read this article and I found that the MHD logo was gone from the page and has apparently been deleted, so I added this new logo, which is not a good quality logo but it's the best I could find. Could somoene find the logo that was there originally and post it back or could someone fix the logo that is there?
Image:Mfest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:MMore HD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Firstchoice 1983logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 21:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
This article needed a significant amount of cleanup in terms of both nonfree image overuse and spam/ad copy (much of which was intertwined). I would encourage all editors to reference our neutral point of view and nonfree image requirements for any clarification. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
The Movie Network vs. Movie Central is not a duopoly. In economics, a duopoly is the direct competition of two comparable enterprises against each other (and no others). Under these conditions, there is little incentive for one to do anything beyond match basically what the other is offering - any attempt to further undercut pricing brings down the market price as a whole, so normally does not happen. The Movie Network and Movie Central are a pair of regional monopolies; because they divided the country geographically between themselves ( The Movie Network going east while Movie Central is Manitoba westward) they compete with no one - not even each other - as premium cable movie services. They charge whatever the market (or governmental regulators) will bear. Instead of just one direct competitor, there is no direct competitor... a key factual distinction. Any re-insertion of text describing this arrangement as "duopoly" is factually wrong and should be fixed. -- 66.102.80.212 ( talk) 02:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Au contraire, Movie Central is what replaced Super Channel after it went west-only - at least if you mean the original Canadian pay-TV channel of that name. The two originally competed directly at inception (February 1983), along with a third part-time C Channel that was soon defunct. The two surviving channels then divided the country into two regional monopolies. They justified this at the time by claiming weak demand for the programming (at least at the rates then being charged for one channel) and by claiming that videocassette rentals remained as their competitor. -- 66.102.80.212 ( talk) 06:42, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Was reading http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/188-bell-fibe-tv/252833-fibe-tv-programming-packages-pricing-discussion.html#post2686649 and 16 jan 2016 post says "Kids Suite used to be part of the TMN Movies package.". Does anyone happen to know what year that was? I would like to check TMN site archives to see if it was mentioned. ScratchMarshall ( talk) 20:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved ( non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 23:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Crave (TV network) → Crave (TV channel) – Speedy: Not a network by definition Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merged from First Choice (pay-tv) page that I created weekend of 2006-07-01, as recommended by User:stickguy. What do I do with the original First Choice article? -- Jimj wpg 03:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Completed merge of First Choice (pay-tv) with this page (The Movie Network), as per advice from Uer:stickyguy. -- Jimj wpg 14:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
I recently read this article and I found that the MHD logo was gone from the page and has apparently been deleted, so I added this new logo, which is not a good quality logo but it's the best I could find. Could somoene find the logo that was there originally and post it back or could someone fix the logo that is there?
Image:Mfest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:MMore HD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Image:Firstchoice 1983logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 21:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
This article needed a significant amount of cleanup in terms of both nonfree image overuse and spam/ad copy (much of which was intertwined). I would encourage all editors to reference our neutral point of view and nonfree image requirements for any clarification. Seraphimblade Talk to me 07:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
The Movie Network vs. Movie Central is not a duopoly. In economics, a duopoly is the direct competition of two comparable enterprises against each other (and no others). Under these conditions, there is little incentive for one to do anything beyond match basically what the other is offering - any attempt to further undercut pricing brings down the market price as a whole, so normally does not happen. The Movie Network and Movie Central are a pair of regional monopolies; because they divided the country geographically between themselves ( The Movie Network going east while Movie Central is Manitoba westward) they compete with no one - not even each other - as premium cable movie services. They charge whatever the market (or governmental regulators) will bear. Instead of just one direct competitor, there is no direct competitor... a key factual distinction. Any re-insertion of text describing this arrangement as "duopoly" is factually wrong and should be fixed. -- 66.102.80.212 ( talk) 02:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Au contraire, Movie Central is what replaced Super Channel after it went west-only - at least if you mean the original Canadian pay-TV channel of that name. The two originally competed directly at inception (February 1983), along with a third part-time C Channel that was soon defunct. The two surviving channels then divided the country into two regional monopolies. They justified this at the time by claiming weak demand for the programming (at least at the rates then being charged for one channel) and by claiming that videocassette rentals remained as their competitor. -- 66.102.80.212 ( talk) 06:42, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Was reading http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/188-bell-fibe-tv/252833-fibe-tv-programming-packages-pricing-discussion.html#post2686649 and 16 jan 2016 post says "Kids Suite used to be part of the TMN Movies package.". Does anyone happen to know what year that was? I would like to check TMN site archives to see if it was mentioned. ScratchMarshall ( talk) 20:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not moved ( non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 23:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Crave (TV network) → Crave (TV channel) – Speedy: Not a network by definition Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 02:01, 18 October 2020 (UTC)