![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion discussion is here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cppcheck. Yasca and Clang fail the notability check proposed by Cunard. Also the backed up page User:Exuwon/Cppcheck now contains references. What's missing for inclusion then? 131.220.99.58 ( talk) 03:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks to several editors the article has been reborn in a form that should indicate notability and use proper sources. Thanks to all who assisted, and to those who will improve the start we've made. AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 19:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
I've removed the Accuracy section for a number of reasons. First, it was improperly sourced; for example, using the bug tracker as a reference to say "it doesn't detect many bugs" is inappropriate. And text like "it is far from finished" doesn't really belong either. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cppcheck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:57, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion discussion is here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cppcheck. Yasca and Clang fail the notability check proposed by Cunard. Also the backed up page User:Exuwon/Cppcheck now contains references. What's missing for inclusion then? 131.220.99.58 ( talk) 03:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks to several editors the article has been reborn in a form that should indicate notability and use proper sources. Thanks to all who assisted, and to those who will improve the start we've made. AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 19:05, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
I've removed the Accuracy section for a number of reasons. First, it was improperly sourced; for example, using the bug tracker as a reference to say "it doesn't detect many bugs" is inappropriate. And text like "it is far from finished" doesn't really belong either. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cppcheck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:57, 14 August 2017 (UTC)