This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cowes Week article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
edited so that the article reflects title, and instead wrote a short sentence about their sponsorship in the description. Previously, it was an example of blatant promotion, and was confusing given all the pictures gave the name of the previous sponsor. 193.82.52.4 ( talk) 13:35, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
I removed this sentence
as it didn't seem to add anything and was tending towards the POV. Naturenet 12:35, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Is this template relevant to this article? It's not really to do with Cowes Week but more general. I'm considering removing it. Naturenet 09:18, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Well, no, not really, although I think it's a very good template, and links to some useful information. Let me explain why I disagree still. The way I see it is that there is plenty of opportunity for someone who wants to know about a certain class of boat in general to use Wikipedia, and indeed other links (mainly the categories, which are very comprehensive) on the Cowes Week page, to find it. That would indeed widen the area of interest, but it would widen it beyond Cowes Week, which is the article subject. The template is nothing in particular to do with Cowes Week - in fact, several of the boat types in the template don't race there and probably never will. A category or list of all boat types which have ever raced at Cowes Week would be useful and relevant; but if you included in this article a template for every class of vessel which might possibly race at Cowes, you can see how the article would become unmanageable, and nothing to do with its subject. So it's not because I don't think it's good information, or worth linking to, that I disagree. It's because I don't think the template is actually relevant to Cowes Week and that the information can already be accessed by other means. Naturenet 17:40, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for being accommodating. External links would be very good - any suggestions? I'd love to see you fill out some of the missing facts - I'm guessing from your handle that you might know some of them? Naturenet 20:57, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Hi I added the external link destinationcowes.com which nature net proposes deleting. This is a non for profit site and list many local resources such as emergency rigging/sail repairs all of which are vital to Cowes week racers. It also features an extensive list of crew registers again pretty relevant to Cowes week. The Official Skandia Cowes Week site only features their points of view on it's forums. e.g. If you post a comment that doesn't fit in with their image e.g. beer prices being expensive it's deleted. Destination Cowes tells gives you the lowdown on Cowes. Hopefully anyone else who lives there will support this posting and the sites 'non-deletion'.
Image is terrible. I'm going to remove it until a new one can be found. Isopropyl 02:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
This looks like just a vanity item, but rather than remove it, perhaps could someone please add some of the other more famous prizes and trophies? Jezza 11:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
DenverG 12:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC) I see on this page that Cowes week is claimed to be the oldest running regatta in the world. The Gravesend regatta has been running since tudor times and the first definitive recorded date is 1698 which pre-dates cowes by 152 years. I cannot guarantee the authenticity of this, but the page at http://town.regatta.users.btopenworld.com/History.html mentions the history if the event which could possibly be confirmed by someone else.
Reference for Skandia's 14-year sponsorship of Cowes Week (1995 to 2009): BBC News - Skandia pulls out of Cowes Week. - Stelio ( talk) 15:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
You should know about this and comment. One of our editors has systematically depopulated it (perhaps from this article among many others), and thinks that is a good reason to delete it. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
You should know about this and comment. One of our editors has systematically depopulated it (perhaps from this article among many others), and thinks that is a good reason to delete it. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cowes Week. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cowes Week. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cowes Week. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Cowes Week article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
edited so that the article reflects title, and instead wrote a short sentence about their sponsorship in the description. Previously, it was an example of blatant promotion, and was confusing given all the pictures gave the name of the previous sponsor. 193.82.52.4 ( talk) 13:35, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
I removed this sentence
as it didn't seem to add anything and was tending towards the POV. Naturenet 12:35, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Is this template relevant to this article? It's not really to do with Cowes Week but more general. I'm considering removing it. Naturenet 09:18, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Well, no, not really, although I think it's a very good template, and links to some useful information. Let me explain why I disagree still. The way I see it is that there is plenty of opportunity for someone who wants to know about a certain class of boat in general to use Wikipedia, and indeed other links (mainly the categories, which are very comprehensive) on the Cowes Week page, to find it. That would indeed widen the area of interest, but it would widen it beyond Cowes Week, which is the article subject. The template is nothing in particular to do with Cowes Week - in fact, several of the boat types in the template don't race there and probably never will. A category or list of all boat types which have ever raced at Cowes Week would be useful and relevant; but if you included in this article a template for every class of vessel which might possibly race at Cowes, you can see how the article would become unmanageable, and nothing to do with its subject. So it's not because I don't think it's good information, or worth linking to, that I disagree. It's because I don't think the template is actually relevant to Cowes Week and that the information can already be accessed by other means. Naturenet 17:40, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for being accommodating. External links would be very good - any suggestions? I'd love to see you fill out some of the missing facts - I'm guessing from your handle that you might know some of them? Naturenet 20:57, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Hi I added the external link destinationcowes.com which nature net proposes deleting. This is a non for profit site and list many local resources such as emergency rigging/sail repairs all of which are vital to Cowes week racers. It also features an extensive list of crew registers again pretty relevant to Cowes week. The Official Skandia Cowes Week site only features their points of view on it's forums. e.g. If you post a comment that doesn't fit in with their image e.g. beer prices being expensive it's deleted. Destination Cowes tells gives you the lowdown on Cowes. Hopefully anyone else who lives there will support this posting and the sites 'non-deletion'.
Image is terrible. I'm going to remove it until a new one can be found. Isopropyl 02:30, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
This looks like just a vanity item, but rather than remove it, perhaps could someone please add some of the other more famous prizes and trophies? Jezza 11:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
DenverG 12:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC) I see on this page that Cowes week is claimed to be the oldest running regatta in the world. The Gravesend regatta has been running since tudor times and the first definitive recorded date is 1698 which pre-dates cowes by 152 years. I cannot guarantee the authenticity of this, but the page at http://town.regatta.users.btopenworld.com/History.html mentions the history if the event which could possibly be confirmed by someone else.
Reference for Skandia's 14-year sponsorship of Cowes Week (1995 to 2009): BBC News - Skandia pulls out of Cowes Week. - Stelio ( talk) 15:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
You should know about this and comment. One of our editors has systematically depopulated it (perhaps from this article among many others), and thinks that is a good reason to delete it. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
You should know about this and comment. One of our editors has systematically depopulated it (perhaps from this article among many others), and thinks that is a good reason to delete it. 7&6=thirteen ( ☎) 19:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cowes Week. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 04:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cowes Week. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cowes Week. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:19, 14 December 2017 (UTC)