This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
County Road 509 (Brevard County, Florida) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 January 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to List of county roads in Brevard County, Florida. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Keep, recommend keeping this article. I believe this article has potential for expansion. FieldMarine ( talk) 06:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
My apologies - the template on the article directed me here to place a comment, which I did. FieldMarine ( talk) 01:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
As for the credibility of the online source on Joe Wickham, I had the same concern because of the use of a Wikipedia as one of the four references cited in the bibliography. However, I decided to use it because after reading the Joseph H. Wickham article in wikipedia, there was no mention of the information about Wickham Road as used for this article. Thus, I figured the information came from one of the other four sources used to write the online article in question. Semper Fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 14:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
I have included a section on points of interest. An editor had reverted the section & I put it back in place. IMHO, the consolidated bullets improves the article. Please comments so we can gain consensus. Thanks! FieldMarine ( talk) 23:02, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
I understand your point about consistency across article types, but, IMHO, I believe the points of interest section adds value to the article & I don’t see how it goes against the
Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Standards. If anything, I believe it to supplement that structure & I don’t see how it is subjective if the points are already listed in Wikipedia. However, we can also include a section on the talk page with dialogue for others to comment on about the points on the list in case someone feels an item should/should not be included on the list. IMHO, gaining consensus in this manner will decrease subjectivity.
Please add here how you would include the landmark section so we can take a close look at both approaches & provide an opportunity for others to comment as well. Semper Fi,
FieldMarine (
talk)
01:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
County Road 509 (Brevard County, Florida) redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 January 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to List of county roads in Brevard County, Florida. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Keep, recommend keeping this article. I believe this article has potential for expansion. FieldMarine ( talk) 06:10, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
My apologies - the template on the article directed me here to place a comment, which I did. FieldMarine ( talk) 01:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
As for the credibility of the online source on Joe Wickham, I had the same concern because of the use of a Wikipedia as one of the four references cited in the bibliography. However, I decided to use it because after reading the Joseph H. Wickham article in wikipedia, there was no mention of the information about Wickham Road as used for this article. Thus, I figured the information came from one of the other four sources used to write the online article in question. Semper Fi! FieldMarine ( talk) 14:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
I have included a section on points of interest. An editor had reverted the section & I put it back in place. IMHO, the consolidated bullets improves the article. Please comments so we can gain consensus. Thanks! FieldMarine ( talk) 23:02, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
I understand your point about consistency across article types, but, IMHO, I believe the points of interest section adds value to the article & I don’t see how it goes against the
Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Standards. If anything, I believe it to supplement that structure & I don’t see how it is subjective if the points are already listed in Wikipedia. However, we can also include a section on the talk page with dialogue for others to comment on about the points on the list in case someone feels an item should/should not be included on the list. IMHO, gaining consensus in this manner will decrease subjectivity.
Please add here how you would include the landmark section so we can take a close look at both approaches & provide an opportunity for others to comment as well. Semper Fi,
FieldMarine (
talk)
01:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)