![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 May 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
An unregistered user from Sacramento, CA went in on April 20 at 19:44 UTC and vandalized the page with minor edits (here and on the page for Burning Man). I have reverted the article back to its previous state. Blck Blk ( talk) 23:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
I added the logo to the top of the screenshot, as specified by the software infobox template, but I don't feel the screenshot is really necessary? Should we maybe remove the screenshot, maybe move it into the article, and have only the logo in the infobox? -- Johanvanl ( talk) 13:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Counterparty (technology). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
It was kept at AfD in 2014 mainly because of a single Minyanville article. The other sources they mentioned are mentions and cryptocurrency news. This would not be enough to pass today. Is there anything better? Џ 11:34, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
References
David Gerard, would you please elaborate on why you do not consider Bitcoin Insider and Crypto Briefing, in particular, to be reliable sources? -- Moontreasure ( talk) 18:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 May 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
An unregistered user from Sacramento, CA went in on April 20 at 19:44 UTC and vandalized the page with minor edits (here and on the page for Burning Man). I have reverted the article back to its previous state. Blck Blk ( talk) 23:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
I added the logo to the top of the screenshot, as specified by the software infobox template, but I don't feel the screenshot is really necessary? Should we maybe remove the screenshot, maybe move it into the article, and have only the logo in the infobox? -- Johanvanl ( talk) 13:54, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Counterparty (technology). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:00, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
It was kept at AfD in 2014 mainly because of a single Minyanville article. The other sources they mentioned are mentions and cryptocurrency news. This would not be enough to pass today. Is there anything better? Џ 11:34, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
References
David Gerard, would you please elaborate on why you do not consider Bitcoin Insider and Crypto Briefing, in particular, to be reliable sources? -- Moontreasure ( talk) 18:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)