This article was nominated for deletion on 25/2/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
It was wrong to label this a part of the "Bush administration", as if the president himself has control over a small office within the State Department. I've cleaned it up some. Rhobite 01:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Unfortunately people have a poor conception of how government works and the bureaucracy involved. This is a legitimate function of the State Department; if people are slandering you, are you expected to take it or refute it? -- Mmx1 17:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
"Jyri Raivio, a journalist in Finland's Helsingin Sanomat newspaper...". I am from Finland and the Helsingin Sanomat drops through my mailbox every morning. I would say that using this second hand quote of an opinion piece is utterly non-encyclopedic. There are all kinds of almost blog-type opinion pieces in the newspaper. Using random out of context clippings of quotes of chatty editorial musings is utterly irresponsible POV pushing for an encyclopedia editor. Weregerbil 18:23, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
But deleting criticism is not, right? -- Striver 23:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Taking into account:
Yes, I intend to delete the quote as utterly unencyclopedic and lacking genuine verification. Weregerbil 13:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Counter Misinformation Team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/19/AR2006101901570.html - Location ( talk) 23:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 25/2/2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
It was wrong to label this a part of the "Bush administration", as if the president himself has control over a small office within the State Department. I've cleaned it up some. Rhobite 01:59, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Unfortunately people have a poor conception of how government works and the bureaucracy involved. This is a legitimate function of the State Department; if people are slandering you, are you expected to take it or refute it? -- Mmx1 17:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
"Jyri Raivio, a journalist in Finland's Helsingin Sanomat newspaper...". I am from Finland and the Helsingin Sanomat drops through my mailbox every morning. I would say that using this second hand quote of an opinion piece is utterly non-encyclopedic. There are all kinds of almost blog-type opinion pieces in the newspaper. Using random out of context clippings of quotes of chatty editorial musings is utterly irresponsible POV pushing for an encyclopedia editor. Weregerbil 18:23, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
But deleting criticism is not, right? -- Striver 23:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Taking into account:
Yes, I intend to delete the quote as utterly unencyclopedic and lacking genuine verification. Weregerbil 13:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Counter Misinformation Team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/19/AR2006101901570.html - Location ( talk) 23:27, 2 September 2017 (UTC)