This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 1 The pictures need citations. At least you referenced the first one, but it needs a full citation.
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2 none except peer-review
7. Formatting: 2 I'm actually not sure if the project banner belongs in "External Links," but at least it's there.
8. Writing: 1 frequent comma errors
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 2 The article is well-referenced except for the pictures, which were appealing. Other peers have complained about your organization, but I think it's a deliberate, useful choice rather than a mistake. Knowledge depends on research, so it makes sense to organize it that way if necessary, and you've done a poignant and helpful job of reviewing the literature and identifying important points.
Total: 18/20
Also, I cannot believe there's another doctor named Ron Paul. That's funny.
SarahReed54 ( talk) 20:55, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Total: 17 out of 20 -- poornarajeevan ( talk)19:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
SarahReed54 ( talk) 20:39, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2 (no comments posted)
7. Formatting: 1
8. Writing: 2
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 1
_________________________________
Total: 18 out of 20
Bahar.rahsepar (
talk) 22:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
SarahReed54 ( talk) 20:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 1 The pictures need citations. At least you referenced the first one, but it needs a full citation.
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2 none except peer-review
7. Formatting: 2 I'm actually not sure if the project banner belongs in "External Links," but at least it's there.
8. Writing: 1 frequent comma errors
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 2 The article is well-referenced except for the pictures, which were appealing. Other peers have complained about your organization, but I think it's a deliberate, useful choice rather than a mistake. Knowledge depends on research, so it makes sense to organize it that way if necessary, and you've done a poignant and helpful job of reviewing the literature and identifying important points.
Total: 18/20
Also, I cannot believe there's another doctor named Ron Paul. That's funny.
SarahReed54 ( talk) 20:55, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Total: 17 out of 20 -- poornarajeevan ( talk)19:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
SarahReed54 ( talk) 20:39, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 2
6. Responsive to comments: 2 (no comments posted)
7. Formatting: 1
8. Writing: 2
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 1
_________________________________
Total: 18 out of 20
Bahar.rahsepar (
talk) 22:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
SarahReed54 ( talk) 20:30, 27 November 2013 (UTC)