While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Please, can somebody add the Digital TV corruption, also called " TDT-Party"?
FAR-RIGHTED MEDIA COUP D'ETAT IN SPAIN (2009-2012):
Regional private far-righted National Catholicism tv channel of Catholic Church, TV Mediterráneo instead.
FAR-RIGHTED MEDIA COUP D'ETAT IN SPAIN (2012-2015):
Most of local journalists are jobless.
Consecuences of the FAR-RIGHTED MEDIA COUP D'ETAT IN SPAIN 2009-2015:
--Unsigned by 178.170.111.13
This is a encyclopedia, not a forum for writing falsehoods and insults to everybody. Asturkian ( talk) 11:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Someone added a cleanup tag to this article a few years ago, but the reason for this is still not clear. Can anyone explain the reason for this cleanup tag? Jarble ( talk) 17:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
I find that the spanish dictatorship achievements are biased or directly not true:
During his time, Spanish people started at last to create a middle class an economic prosperity as never before in Spanish history, he created the first social security system, pension retirement and security was totally assured to the Spanish population
It is very simple, the article is not neutral, it is badly written and of typical low grade. This article is very biased due to the omission of corruption during the decade of 1980 under the successive Socialist governments, national and regional. The truth is, sadly, Spain is well known for being an incredibly corrupt society in general, not just politicians and business people. This must also be reflected, and it is not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.73.101.79 ( talk) 12:08, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Additionally, there are irrelevant overtones of complete lack of factual knowledge when people who were not alive during some of the controversial periods of Spanish history, take the liberty to publish opinions based on stories heard from their grandparents. This is mistakenly called the collective memory of the Spaniards, which should be called instead selective and manipulative memory of the Spaniards.
The XX century was unkind to all peoples and nations, there is nothing especial about the history of Spain during those periods, nothing so exceptional that justifies such a lingering level of hate of imaginary institutions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.73.101.79 ( talk) 12:12, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
There are almost just corruption cases of the conservative party (PP). If you open the spanish version of the article you will see there is a plethora of corruption cases linked to the Socialist party: flick, filesa, Roldan, Salanueva, Ave, Amy Martin... or to nationalists parties: Campeón, Puyol, ITV... Some of them of really big dimensions, or even linked to organized crime and they are not even mentioned. On the other hand the case "Privatisations" is just preposterous, most of it are just weasel words or just not true. Maybe that's the reason there is no mention to it at all in the spanish version. Felipe Gonzalez started in 1982 privatising public companies (about 80), then Jose Maria Aznar continued them (50) as Zapatero did. Aznar created a golden share to have Veto powers in strategical former state owned companies (like the german government in Volkswagen among others) and the european cort of justice ruled it was against free competition. No corruption whatsoever. In 2012 the region of Madrid wanted to extenalize just the hospital management of several hospitals but this plan was backed out A public doctors associations complained afterwards and the case was dismissed by a judge. But it has nothing to do with Aznar privatising state owned companies in the late 90s MateoSag ( talk) 10:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Footnote 23 links to the "Turkey Telegraph". Does this need its own page? How do we know it's a reliable source?
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Please, can somebody add the Digital TV corruption, also called " TDT-Party"?
FAR-RIGHTED MEDIA COUP D'ETAT IN SPAIN (2009-2012):
Regional private far-righted National Catholicism tv channel of Catholic Church, TV Mediterráneo instead.
FAR-RIGHTED MEDIA COUP D'ETAT IN SPAIN (2012-2015):
Most of local journalists are jobless.
Consecuences of the FAR-RIGHTED MEDIA COUP D'ETAT IN SPAIN 2009-2015:
--Unsigned by 178.170.111.13
This is a encyclopedia, not a forum for writing falsehoods and insults to everybody. Asturkian ( talk) 11:39, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
Someone added a cleanup tag to this article a few years ago, but the reason for this is still not clear. Can anyone explain the reason for this cleanup tag? Jarble ( talk) 17:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
I find that the spanish dictatorship achievements are biased or directly not true:
During his time, Spanish people started at last to create a middle class an economic prosperity as never before in Spanish history, he created the first social security system, pension retirement and security was totally assured to the Spanish population
It is very simple, the article is not neutral, it is badly written and of typical low grade. This article is very biased due to the omission of corruption during the decade of 1980 under the successive Socialist governments, national and regional. The truth is, sadly, Spain is well known for being an incredibly corrupt society in general, not just politicians and business people. This must also be reflected, and it is not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.73.101.79 ( talk) 12:08, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Additionally, there are irrelevant overtones of complete lack of factual knowledge when people who were not alive during some of the controversial periods of Spanish history, take the liberty to publish opinions based on stories heard from their grandparents. This is mistakenly called the collective memory of the Spaniards, which should be called instead selective and manipulative memory of the Spaniards.
The XX century was unkind to all peoples and nations, there is nothing especial about the history of Spain during those periods, nothing so exceptional that justifies such a lingering level of hate of imaginary institutions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.73.101.79 ( talk) 12:12, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
There are almost just corruption cases of the conservative party (PP). If you open the spanish version of the article you will see there is a plethora of corruption cases linked to the Socialist party: flick, filesa, Roldan, Salanueva, Ave, Amy Martin... or to nationalists parties: Campeón, Puyol, ITV... Some of them of really big dimensions, or even linked to organized crime and they are not even mentioned. On the other hand the case "Privatisations" is just preposterous, most of it are just weasel words or just not true. Maybe that's the reason there is no mention to it at all in the spanish version. Felipe Gonzalez started in 1982 privatising public companies (about 80), then Jose Maria Aznar continued them (50) as Zapatero did. Aznar created a golden share to have Veto powers in strategical former state owned companies (like the german government in Volkswagen among others) and the european cort of justice ruled it was against free competition. No corruption whatsoever. In 2012 the region of Madrid wanted to extenalize just the hospital management of several hospitals but this plan was backed out A public doctors associations complained afterwards and the case was dismissed by a judge. But it has nothing to do with Aznar privatising state owned companies in the late 90s MateoSag ( talk) 10:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Footnote 23 links to the "Turkey Telegraph". Does this need its own page? How do we know it's a reliable source?