![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think American Task Force Argentina should be cited as a reference in this article, as it is a lobby group for vulture funds with clear and morally questionable economic interests. 168.96.149.34 ( talk) 06:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Would anyone be willing to take another look at the assessment here? I think it is above a C-Class rating, and have reviewed the criteria for a B rating. I think it meets those standards. However, I didn't want to jump on this and do it myself since I made major contributions to this page. I will check back routinely for any updates on this. DaltonCastle ( talk) 17:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I have changed the rating to B class. No one looked at this so I took it upon myself. If someone disagrees I will gladly work with someone to improve the page. However, I believe this page meets the criteria for B class. DaltonCastle ( talk) 20:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
The death of Alberto Nisman should be removed from this article. It is a scandal, yes, but not a corruption-related scandal, which is the focus of this page. Cambalachero ( talk) 14:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
There is a confusion here, over the meaning of "corruption". It does not equal "abuse of power"; it's just one form of abuse of power, but not the only one. I propose the following guidelines when adding cases:
Corruption is defined as any abuse of power through dishonesty or misconduct. Not necessarily for financial gain but generally for something gained. In this case, although not proven, it is alleged that the administration was covering its tracks because it wanted favourable terms with Iran. This is clear-cut corruption. DaltonCastle ( talk) 18:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Merriam Webster. I am going to make more progress on this section and add details that will indicate its relevance. Please be patient while I put this together. DaltonCastle ( talk) 19:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Please stop removing the details of the Nisman case. It is notable, sourced reliably, and related to corruption. Now if all doubters are convinced there was no wrongdoing, then the info can be removed. However, currently, several major organizations, news agencies, and government departments around the world, as well as large numbers of Argentines. If this changes, I will be the first to take down the case. DaltonCastle ( talk) 03:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
That was rude and I'd like you to please remain civil. I'm not denying your points, but I'm saying there are several organizations and polls that believe there was a government hand in the murder. These views are covered in reliable sources, not on conspiracy-theory sites. DaltonCastle ( talk) 20:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Corruption in Argentina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I don't think American Task Force Argentina should be cited as a reference in this article, as it is a lobby group for vulture funds with clear and morally questionable economic interests. 168.96.149.34 ( talk) 06:50, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Would anyone be willing to take another look at the assessment here? I think it is above a C-Class rating, and have reviewed the criteria for a B rating. I think it meets those standards. However, I didn't want to jump on this and do it myself since I made major contributions to this page. I will check back routinely for any updates on this. DaltonCastle ( talk) 17:46, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
I have changed the rating to B class. No one looked at this so I took it upon myself. If someone disagrees I will gladly work with someone to improve the page. However, I believe this page meets the criteria for B class. DaltonCastle ( talk) 20:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
The death of Alberto Nisman should be removed from this article. It is a scandal, yes, but not a corruption-related scandal, which is the focus of this page. Cambalachero ( talk) 14:29, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
There is a confusion here, over the meaning of "corruption". It does not equal "abuse of power"; it's just one form of abuse of power, but not the only one. I propose the following guidelines when adding cases:
Corruption is defined as any abuse of power through dishonesty or misconduct. Not necessarily for financial gain but generally for something gained. In this case, although not proven, it is alleged that the administration was covering its tracks because it wanted favourable terms with Iran. This is clear-cut corruption. DaltonCastle ( talk) 18:26, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Merriam Webster. I am going to make more progress on this section and add details that will indicate its relevance. Please be patient while I put this together. DaltonCastle ( talk) 19:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Please stop removing the details of the Nisman case. It is notable, sourced reliably, and related to corruption. Now if all doubters are convinced there was no wrongdoing, then the info can be removed. However, currently, several major organizations, news agencies, and government departments around the world, as well as large numbers of Argentines. If this changes, I will be the first to take down the case. DaltonCastle ( talk) 03:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
That was rude and I'd like you to please remain civil. I'm not denying your points, but I'm saying there are several organizations and polls that believe there was a government hand in the murder. These views are covered in reliable sources, not on conspiracy-theory sites. DaltonCastle ( talk) 20:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Corruption in Argentina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)