From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Coemgenus ( talk · contribs) 13:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC) reply

I'll review this over the next few days. -- Coemgenus ( talk) 13:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

Images
  • I think the fair use rationale on the Rhodes image is appropriate, and the other pic seems OK, too.
Early life and education
  • Do we know his parents' names?
Puerto Rico
  • You should make clear that Nieto Editores is a journal (i think that's what it is, based on a Google search). Maybe something like "... the journal Nieto Editores reported..."
  • "...while referred to as patients, they were primarily clinical subjects. " I'm not sure what the distinction is. It might benefit the reader to explain it.
Overall
Scandal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Coemgenus ( talk · contribs) 13:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC) reply

I'll review this over the next few days. -- Coemgenus ( talk) 13:17, 2 March 2015 (UTC) reply

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

Images
  • I think the fair use rationale on the Rhodes image is appropriate, and the other pic seems OK, too.
Early life and education
  • Do we know his parents' names?
Puerto Rico
  • You should make clear that Nieto Editores is a journal (i think that's what it is, based on a Google search). Maybe something like "... the journal Nieto Editores reported..."
  • "...while referred to as patients, they were primarily clinical subjects. " I'm not sure what the distinction is. It might benefit the reader to explain it.
Overall
Scandal

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook