![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Corby line. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Corby railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ing-media.com/render.aspx?siteID=1&navIDs=1%2C11%2C155%2C220When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
The article claims that Herten in Germany and Łomża in Poland are both larger than Corby. However, taking the figures presented in the respective Wikipedia articles, the population figures are 72,218 for Corby, 62,779 for Łomża and 61,821 for Herten. This makes Corby the largest of them by some margin. Renerpho ( talk) 05:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
I feel the article should be re-arranged a bit given the reopening is now "History", and the "Future" consists of the improved services which have already happened, and the East West Rail Northern Route, which didn't happen. However I'm not sure how best to do this, if I simply merged the Reopening into the History header, it would make the history section very long. Thoughts? NemesisAT ( talk) 14:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hope you all dont mind, but I have added a whole new section on electrification GRALISTAIR ( talk) 02:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Corby line. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Corby railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.ing-media.com/render.aspx?siteID=1&navIDs=1%2C11%2C155%2C220When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
The article claims that Herten in Germany and Łomża in Poland are both larger than Corby. However, taking the figures presented in the respective Wikipedia articles, the population figures are 72,218 for Corby, 62,779 for Łomża and 61,821 for Herten. This makes Corby the largest of them by some margin. Renerpho ( talk) 05:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
I feel the article should be re-arranged a bit given the reopening is now "History", and the "Future" consists of the improved services which have already happened, and the East West Rail Northern Route, which didn't happen. However I'm not sure how best to do this, if I simply merged the Reopening into the History header, it would make the history section very long. Thoughts? NemesisAT ( talk) 14:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Hope you all dont mind, but I have added a whole new section on electrification GRALISTAIR ( talk) 02:24, 28 January 2022 (UTC)