This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
|
|
What if anything can be taken from these PDFs of letters and filings from Graphene and Copperhead? [1] [2] [3] -- Yae4 ( talk) 13:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Copperhead OS's page should be clearly divided into historical parts before Micay's departure and their current closed source distribution after Micay's departure. As Micay said, Copperhead is clearly compromized in its current form, so users should adopt Graphene or another distribution like Lineage. This should be made clear in the introduction, perhaps by making closed source appear in the first sentence, and delaying any spurious security claims until the body. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.25.6.87 ( talk) 12:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
As of 15 February 2021
[update], the OS still is being developed.
copperhead
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
A lot of the history centers on Micay. I saw a couple primary sources that may be of interest for the article.
In 2017, Micay said maintaining hardened Android kernels was part of "my job" and he spent "far more than 40 hours a week on CopperheadOS". This was in context of stopping support of Arch packages PaX and grsecurity. [4]
In 2012 Micay posted an application for Arch Linux Trusted User, and gave other background. [5] -- Yae4 ( talk) 01:33, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
|
|
What if anything can be taken from these PDFs of letters and filings from Graphene and Copperhead? [1] [2] [3] -- Yae4 ( talk) 13:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Copperhead OS's page should be clearly divided into historical parts before Micay's departure and their current closed source distribution after Micay's departure. As Micay said, Copperhead is clearly compromized in its current form, so users should adopt Graphene or another distribution like Lineage. This should be made clear in the introduction, perhaps by making closed source appear in the first sentence, and delaying any spurious security claims until the body. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.25.6.87 ( talk) 12:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
As of 15 February 2021
[update], the OS still is being developed.
copperhead
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 05:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
A lot of the history centers on Micay. I saw a couple primary sources that may be of interest for the article.
In 2017, Micay said maintaining hardened Android kernels was part of "my job" and he spent "far more than 40 hours a week on CopperheadOS". This was in context of stopping support of Arch packages PaX and grsecurity. [4]
In 2012 Micay posted an application for Arch Linux Trusted User, and gave other background. [5] -- Yae4 ( talk) 01:33, 7 December 2022 (UTC)