GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Dana boomer ( talk · contribs) 14:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have my full review up shortly. Dana boomer ( talk) 14:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I am going to fail this article's nomination for GA status. The most serious issue is the sourcing, but there are also quite a few other problems:
Overall, this article is quite a ways from good article status. I would suggest the nominator (who, as far as I can see, has made no edits to the article) work on this article with an eye towards proper and complete sourcing, serviceable prose, and basic MOS compliance. Although the article is in decent shape for one on a city of this size, it still needs quite a bit of work before it meets the good article criteria. If you have any questions, please let me know, Dana boomer ( talk) 15:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Dana boomer ( talk · contribs) 14:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have my full review up shortly. Dana boomer ( talk) 14:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Unfortunately, I am going to fail this article's nomination for GA status. The most serious issue is the sourcing, but there are also quite a few other problems:
Overall, this article is quite a ways from good article status. I would suggest the nominator (who, as far as I can see, has made no edits to the article) work on this article with an eye towards proper and complete sourcing, serviceable prose, and basic MOS compliance. Although the article is in decent shape for one on a city of this size, it still needs quite a bit of work before it meets the good article criteria. If you have any questions, please let me know, Dana boomer ( talk) 15:25, 2 April 2012 (UTC)