 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Shouldn't that be 'surface to volume'? It's that term which is used most commonly in the sciences. One reason is that mass depends on density while surface area and volume are both directly proportional to length (and have units of length^2 and length^3, respectively). Unless 'surface to mass' is a term from brewing terminology, it ought to be changed. 40.142.183.146 ( talk) 14:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- The existing source no longer links to relevant material and what you're saying makes sense to me. I will edit the article if there are no objections. Tammbeck talk 14:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Shouldn't that be 'surface to volume'? It's that term which is used most commonly in the sciences. One reason is that mass depends on density while surface area and volume are both directly proportional to length (and have units of length^2 and length^3, respectively). Unless 'surface to mass' is a term from brewing terminology, it ought to be changed. 40.142.183.146 ( talk) 14:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
- The existing source no longer links to relevant material and what you're saying makes sense to me. I will edit the article if there are no objections. Tammbeck talk 14:59, 15 August 2023 (UTC)