![]() | Convergence of accounting standards was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 12, 2014). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Adding some extra references for additions. I may have added a few of these already. - Well-rested Talk 08:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm not a wiki editor so I don't know exactly how I would format a correction the article, or even if my source is reputable enough to correct it. But according to the CPA Journal FASB is no longer endorsing convergence, instead they think a viable alternative is condorsement.
http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/toc2012.htm
If you click on the October 2012 issue you'll find an article on page 62-67 that discusses America's decision to head away from convergence. I think it's a pretty good source, but again I'm not really sure how to format any correction, so I thought I would put the information here for more experienced editors to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.203.166.30 ( talk) 07:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Antidiskriminator ( talk · contribs) 18:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I am planning to review this article.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 18:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I am not an expert in the subject so I apologize in advance if some of my below comments do not make much sense.
I'm failing this review.... this is stale, no edits to this article since January, main contributor to the article haven't really edited in a month, not much of a review but still, this can be renominated Secret account 04:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() | Convergence of accounting standards was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 12, 2014). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Adding some extra references for additions. I may have added a few of these already. - Well-rested Talk 08:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
I'm not a wiki editor so I don't know exactly how I would format a correction the article, or even if my source is reputable enough to correct it. But according to the CPA Journal FASB is no longer endorsing convergence, instead they think a viable alternative is condorsement.
http://www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/toc2012.htm
If you click on the October 2012 issue you'll find an article on page 62-67 that discusses America's decision to head away from convergence. I think it's a pretty good source, but again I'm not really sure how to format any correction, so I thought I would put the information here for more experienced editors to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.203.166.30 ( talk) 07:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Antidiskriminator ( talk · contribs) 18:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I am planning to review this article.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 18:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
I am not an expert in the subject so I apologize in advance if some of my below comments do not make much sense.
I'm failing this review.... this is stale, no edits to this article since January, main contributor to the article haven't really edited in a month, not much of a review but still, this can be renominated Secret account 04:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)