![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This gets the award for the longest run-on sentence with the most undefined vocabulary! -- JimmyButler ( talk) 15:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Due to their tendency to be found in rocks representing offshore, even anoxic, marine bottom environments, some scientists have inferred that these animals may have drifted planktonically for some or all of their lives, ultimately being buried in the anoxic sediments beneath the oxic waters in which they lived.
These should be combined and one eliminated. See Conulariids. Wilson44691 ( talk) 01:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
As for this statement: "... though some doubt exists about whether they should be assigned to the Animalia", may we have a citation? I've not heard of anyone recently doubting the status of conulariids as at least animals. I'm learning new things every day, though! Wilson44691 ( talk) 19:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
In all old and modern publications said that Conulata it is animals. Can you confuse it with "problematica"? Problematica it is fossil organisms whose body plans are so unusual that they cannot be placed in extant phyla. Or idea of not-animal nature of Conulata (algae, fungi or that if it is not animals????) so marginal and absurd that nobody quotes this. The memory it is good but it often mislead. The information should be confirmed by references to the source, otherwise, such information is not reliable.
Van, Iten H. (2006).
"Reassessment of the Phylogenetic Position of Conulariids (?Ediacaran-Triassic) within the Subphylum Medusozoa (Phylum Cnidaria)" (PDF). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 4 (2): 109–118. {{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help) Aleksey (
Alnagov (
talk)
23:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC))
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Full free text{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)<{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Full free text{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Full free text{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Full free textAleksey ( Alnagov ( talk) 00:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC))
Actually there is a pretty good case to be made that conulariids were scyphozoans: [1] Most paleontologists I know consider them scyphozoans or "closely related to scyphozoans". Wilson44691 ( talk) 19:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Conulariida. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This gets the award for the longest run-on sentence with the most undefined vocabulary! -- JimmyButler ( talk) 15:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Due to their tendency to be found in rocks representing offshore, even anoxic, marine bottom environments, some scientists have inferred that these animals may have drifted planktonically for some or all of their lives, ultimately being buried in the anoxic sediments beneath the oxic waters in which they lived.
These should be combined and one eliminated. See Conulariids. Wilson44691 ( talk) 01:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
As for this statement: "... though some doubt exists about whether they should be assigned to the Animalia", may we have a citation? I've not heard of anyone recently doubting the status of conulariids as at least animals. I'm learning new things every day, though! Wilson44691 ( talk) 19:30, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
In all old and modern publications said that Conulata it is animals. Can you confuse it with "problematica"? Problematica it is fossil organisms whose body plans are so unusual that they cannot be placed in extant phyla. Or idea of not-animal nature of Conulata (algae, fungi or that if it is not animals????) so marginal and absurd that nobody quotes this. The memory it is good but it often mislead. The information should be confirmed by references to the source, otherwise, such information is not reliable.
Van, Iten H. (2006).
"Reassessment of the Phylogenetic Position of Conulariids (?Ediacaran-Triassic) within the Subphylum Medusozoa (Phylum Cnidaria)" (PDF). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 4 (2): 109–118. {{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help) Aleksey (
Alnagov (
talk)
23:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC))
{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help){{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Full free text{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)<{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Full free text{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Full free text{{
cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Full free textAleksey ( Alnagov ( talk) 00:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC))
Actually there is a pretty good case to be made that conulariids were scyphozoans: [1] Most paleontologists I know consider them scyphozoans or "closely related to scyphozoans". Wilson44691 ( talk) 19:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Conulariida. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:40, 1 March 2016 (UTC)