![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
"It is believed", "some people prefer", "Various cycles are suggested", "Some sources suggest" - all weasel words that need cited or amended. -- duncan 23:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
"Whilst it may be believed that contrast showers reduce the levels of lactic acid in muscles, thereby reducing or avoiding muscle soreness, the scientific evidence is to the contrary." This implies that contrast showers increase the levels of lactic acid in muscles, rather than stating that the scientific evidence is simply against the theory that lactic acid persists after exercise to cause soreness. 216.165.55.204 ( talk) 19:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Is it worth mentioning Fesig's efforts to revive Inigo by this method?-- Joel 22:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
This article did not mention contrast showers at all (neither did the accompanying correspondence, to the best of my knowledge). The article did discuss lactic acidosis, specifically that the metabolic acidosis is not due to lactic acid build-up, but rather due to the concurrent process of ATP being used, resulting in ADP, Pi and a proton, hence the acidity. I've changed the article to reflect this. Any source that properly explains contrast showers (with EVIDENCE) would be much appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.113.193.249 ( talk) 19:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
This appears to just be a form of hydrotherapy. A mention there should suffice, without all the some peoples. AIRcorn (talk) 06:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
"It is believed", "some people prefer", "Various cycles are suggested", "Some sources suggest" - all weasel words that need cited or amended. -- duncan 23:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
"Whilst it may be believed that contrast showers reduce the levels of lactic acid in muscles, thereby reducing or avoiding muscle soreness, the scientific evidence is to the contrary." This implies that contrast showers increase the levels of lactic acid in muscles, rather than stating that the scientific evidence is simply against the theory that lactic acid persists after exercise to cause soreness. 216.165.55.204 ( talk) 19:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Is it worth mentioning Fesig's efforts to revive Inigo by this method?-- Joel 22:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
This article did not mention contrast showers at all (neither did the accompanying correspondence, to the best of my knowledge). The article did discuss lactic acidosis, specifically that the metabolic acidosis is not due to lactic acid build-up, but rather due to the concurrent process of ATP being used, resulting in ADP, Pi and a proton, hence the acidity. I've changed the article to reflect this. Any source that properly explains contrast showers (with EVIDENCE) would be much appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.113.193.249 ( talk) 19:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
This appears to just be a form of hydrotherapy. A mention there should suffice, without all the some peoples. AIRcorn (talk) 06:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)