This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Would you say this article is ready to be launched? Zazaban ( talk) 18:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Contemporary anarchism's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "graeber":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Jesus Christ, this is a horrible entry. The content is all over the map and doesn't represent contemporary anarchism in the slightest. Indymedia? That project includes some anarchists, but it's not representative of contemporary anarchism. The articles on anarchism here at Wikipedia continue to suck, which is probably why most anarchists read and contribute to wikis run by anarchists. Chuck0 ( talk) 05:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey guys I just need some help with this reference raht hurr that I just can't seem to get working. You see, I'm relatively new to this and I can't figure out how to get the source to display properly under the "References" section. Regards,
TROLL
Anondoesnotforget ( talk) 23:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Both NA and TA have come to prominence in recent years and should be included in this page. How do other editors feel it should be included? -- Rjuner ( talk) 06:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
I have a doubt about this: A number of popular movements in the global South, like the Zapatistas in Mexico and Abahlali baseMjondolo [1] in South Africa...; How can uscundercurrent.wordpress.com be used as a source here? That doesn't count as scholarship where I'm from. —Zujine| talk 18:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
This is essentially a joke song and always was. It was just intended to shock. Neither Lydon, Matlock nor McLaren were ever in any sense anarchists. The lyrics begin "I am an anarchist; I am an anti-Christ." Lydon wasn't a Satanist either. It's obviously tongue in cheek. The article should not take this song seriously. Smokey TheCat 06:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Imclogo2.gif, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC) |
The section on Neoanarchism in the Global South is lacking and only lists two examples, one of which (the Zapatistas in Mexico) doesn't qualify as being in the Global South by most accounts--see map on Global South. Does anyone have a suggestion for improvement, or can we just move the relevant information into another section that makes sense (deleting this section)? —Zujine| talk 05:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Contemporary anarchism's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "acracia.org":
Reference named "ppu.org.uk":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Would you say this article is ready to be launched? Zazaban ( talk) 18:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Contemporary anarchism's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "graeber":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Jesus Christ, this is a horrible entry. The content is all over the map and doesn't represent contemporary anarchism in the slightest. Indymedia? That project includes some anarchists, but it's not representative of contemporary anarchism. The articles on anarchism here at Wikipedia continue to suck, which is probably why most anarchists read and contribute to wikis run by anarchists. Chuck0 ( talk) 05:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey guys I just need some help with this reference raht hurr that I just can't seem to get working. You see, I'm relatively new to this and I can't figure out how to get the source to display properly under the "References" section. Regards,
TROLL
Anondoesnotforget ( talk) 23:25, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Both NA and TA have come to prominence in recent years and should be included in this page. How do other editors feel it should be included? -- Rjuner ( talk) 06:25, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
I have a doubt about this: A number of popular movements in the global South, like the Zapatistas in Mexico and Abahlali baseMjondolo [1] in South Africa...; How can uscundercurrent.wordpress.com be used as a source here? That doesn't count as scholarship where I'm from. —Zujine| talk 18:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
This is essentially a joke song and always was. It was just intended to shock. Neither Lydon, Matlock nor McLaren were ever in any sense anarchists. The lyrics begin "I am an anarchist; I am an anti-Christ." Lydon wasn't a Satanist either. It's obviously tongue in cheek. The article should not take this song seriously. Smokey TheCat 06:20, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:Imclogo2.gif, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 16:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC) |
The section on Neoanarchism in the Global South is lacking and only lists two examples, one of which (the Zapatistas in Mexico) doesn't qualify as being in the Global South by most accounts--see map on Global South. Does anyone have a suggestion for improvement, or can we just move the relevant information into another section that makes sense (deleting this section)? —Zujine| talk 05:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Contemporary anarchism's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "acracia.org":
Reference named "ppu.org.uk":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 26 January 2013 (UTC)