This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
RE: " The United States was also not supportive of the plan because it prohibited unilateral action by the US in protection of its interests. Moreover, the US succeeded in blocking in the plan any recourse to the World Court and United Nations as required by international law."
Can someone tell me why this shouldn't be deleted? The first sentence is fairly accurate, though it criticizes the US position without explaining it. I copy/pasted it only to maintain the context of the second sentence. How did the US block any recourse? What international laws dictate that recourse to WC and UN should be provided? To Whom should recourse have been provided? Why was the US against said recourse? Where is the source?
According to Carlos Romero ("Exporting Peace by Other Means: Venezuela," in Jorge I. Dominguez (ed.), International Security and Democracy: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Post-Cold War Era, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1998, pp. 151-166), the UN was involved. It supported the group from the beginning:
Romero makes no mention of US blocking anything. I don't think he can mention something that didn't happen. If it did happen, why, how, what, source, etc? -- Lacarids ( talk) 21:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
RE: " The United States was also not supportive of the plan because it prohibited unilateral action by the US in protection of its interests. Moreover, the US succeeded in blocking in the plan any recourse to the World Court and United Nations as required by international law."
Can someone tell me why this shouldn't be deleted? The first sentence is fairly accurate, though it criticizes the US position without explaining it. I copy/pasted it only to maintain the context of the second sentence. How did the US block any recourse? What international laws dictate that recourse to WC and UN should be provided? To Whom should recourse have been provided? Why was the US against said recourse? Where is the source?
According to Carlos Romero ("Exporting Peace by Other Means: Venezuela," in Jorge I. Dominguez (ed.), International Security and Democracy: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Post-Cold War Era, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1998, pp. 151-166), the UN was involved. It supported the group from the beginning:
Romero makes no mention of US blocking anything. I don't think he can mention something that didn't happen. If it did happen, why, how, what, source, etc? -- Lacarids ( talk) 21:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)