![]() | Constitutional Council (France) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to [1], the President of the Republic does not pronounce any oath during the Inauguration Ceremony.
Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.
Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 11:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
The article seems to cover the main topics well, and has mostly good referencing, but there are a number of style and copyediting issues that need to be addressed before the article will pass GAN. Some comments:
Once these matters have been seen to, tell me (here or on my talk page) and I will come around and make a copyedit to get rid of any small grammatical, flow and style issues. If the above points are seen to, the article will be very close to good quality. Otherwise, I would like to say that it is an interesting, comprehensive and balanced article covering an important topic. Keep up the good work. Arsenikk (talk) 11:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I am a french lawyer and historian... (sorry for my bad english).
France have no official "coat of arms" (because in a "République", cannot be existing official "coat of arms"... So this one have nothing else to do on this page !... The "Conseil Constitutionnel" have a logo*, better adding it on the page than that fantasy picture !...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/fr/5/59/Logo_Conseil_Constitutionnel_France.gif
Most republic have. And well there's one, it's just not official. Many governement logos are "not official" as far as I remember the rooster is used a symbol but is not defined as "official symbol". Anyway, yes council's logo sounds a better idea.
-- Joujyuze ( talk) 19:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
There is a part that reads "French courts when then prohibited from making rulings of a general nature." which means absolutely nothing, instead of whatever it is trying to say. I do not have the knowledge required to fix this typo, so I am hoping someone who does will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.72.244.156 ( talk) 20:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Nicolas Sarkozy is life member even if he doesn't want to be (cf talk in french article).
In 1975, the Constitutional Council said in a decision that " It is [...] not for the Constitutional Council, when a referral is made to it under Article 61 of the Constitution, to consider the consistency of a statute with the provisions of a treaty or an international agreement; "
However, the article says the contrary in the " Powers and tasks " category.
This control is made by administrative (since 1975, ' Jacques Vabre' decision by the Cour de Cassation) and judiciary courts (since 1989, ' Nicolo' decision by the Conseil d'État).
I'm french, sorry for my english. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clubber.11 ( talk • contribs) 19:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, this article was extremelly precise, it had literally not one inaccuracy, I did not spot any spelling mistake, it was well organised, it had pictures. Sources, it features IPA etc.....it's fine. Almost everything is explained, complete. It's much more neutral than most of french wikipedia articles about France.
I find it to be more than a "good article". I would say it's one of the best articles I read on wikipedia. And prolly the best english speaking article about anything french, and is better than most of those. It is much better than its french counterpart. And it's all neutral. And does not align with official version, and has an encyclopedic style. It's a beautiful article. It also gives everything and more than what you'd find from any official source at once.
So, it should be reviewed as good article.
Thanks for all.
-- Joujyuze ( talk) 19:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
What cases are (not) accepted? Who can argue in front of the Conseil? Etc. Ds77 ( talk) 20:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | Constitutional Council (France) was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to [1], the President of the Republic does not pronounce any oath during the Inauguration Ceremony.
Suggestions generated by an automatic JavaScript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas.
Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk) 11:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
The article seems to cover the main topics well, and has mostly good referencing, but there are a number of style and copyediting issues that need to be addressed before the article will pass GAN. Some comments:
Once these matters have been seen to, tell me (here or on my talk page) and I will come around and make a copyedit to get rid of any small grammatical, flow and style issues. If the above points are seen to, the article will be very close to good quality. Otherwise, I would like to say that it is an interesting, comprehensive and balanced article covering an important topic. Keep up the good work. Arsenikk (talk) 11:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I am a french lawyer and historian... (sorry for my bad english).
France have no official "coat of arms" (because in a "République", cannot be existing official "coat of arms"... So this one have nothing else to do on this page !... The "Conseil Constitutionnel" have a logo*, better adding it on the page than that fantasy picture !...
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/fr/5/59/Logo_Conseil_Constitutionnel_France.gif
Most republic have. And well there's one, it's just not official. Many governement logos are "not official" as far as I remember the rooster is used a symbol but is not defined as "official symbol". Anyway, yes council's logo sounds a better idea.
-- Joujyuze ( talk) 19:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
There is a part that reads "French courts when then prohibited from making rulings of a general nature." which means absolutely nothing, instead of whatever it is trying to say. I do not have the knowledge required to fix this typo, so I am hoping someone who does will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.72.244.156 ( talk) 20:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Nicolas Sarkozy is life member even if he doesn't want to be (cf talk in french article).
In 1975, the Constitutional Council said in a decision that " It is [...] not for the Constitutional Council, when a referral is made to it under Article 61 of the Constitution, to consider the consistency of a statute with the provisions of a treaty or an international agreement; "
However, the article says the contrary in the " Powers and tasks " category.
This control is made by administrative (since 1975, ' Jacques Vabre' decision by the Cour de Cassation) and judiciary courts (since 1989, ' Nicolo' decision by the Conseil d'État).
I'm french, sorry for my english. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clubber.11 ( talk • contribs) 19:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, this article was extremelly precise, it had literally not one inaccuracy, I did not spot any spelling mistake, it was well organised, it had pictures. Sources, it features IPA etc.....it's fine. Almost everything is explained, complete. It's much more neutral than most of french wikipedia articles about France.
I find it to be more than a "good article". I would say it's one of the best articles I read on wikipedia. And prolly the best english speaking article about anything french, and is better than most of those. It is much better than its french counterpart. And it's all neutral. And does not align with official version, and has an encyclopedic style. It's a beautiful article. It also gives everything and more than what you'd find from any official source at once.
So, it should be reviewed as good article.
Thanks for all.
-- Joujyuze ( talk) 19:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
What cases are (not) accepted? Who can argue in front of the Conseil? Etc. Ds77 ( talk) 20:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)