Constitution of Kosovo (1974) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 December 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Constitution of Kosovo. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
A news item involving Constitution of Kosovo was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 16 June 2008. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Constitution of Kosovo (1974) page were merged into Constitution of Kosovo on 11 February 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
A member of the
Guild of Copy Editors,
Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on June 23, 2014. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{
copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our
project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Merge proposal |
I don't wanna be the first to say it, but this article isn't exactly neutral POV. Firstly, if you decide to put history in the article, start from the beginning. Kosovo existed, and thus had a status of some sorts even before the 1800's, and it wasn't ruled by Turks since the beginning of time. And this is where come to the good part: phrases like "Kosovo was militarily occupied and then ceded to Serbia with the decision of the Great Powers.", "Kosovo declared its righteous secession", and such are, well... You know. Let's just say that in the first case the Serbs would say that Kosovo was liberated, and in the other that Albanian separatists committed an unlawful act. Statements like those do not belong to Wikipedia, or any other encyclopedia for that matter. There are many places out there to express opinions, but this is not one of these. I understand that these are turbulent times, but Wikipedia, as you surely know, is not a soapbox. Zhelja ( talk) 01:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Edwin Larkin ( talk) 15:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
"A new Constitution of Kosovo has been drafter and is expected to be ratified soon."
Should this say "drafted" rather than "drafter"? mdkarazim ( talk) 17:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
...Kosovo didn't receive before 1974. It especially didn't have in the 19th century, due to the fact that it was only formed in 1945. -- PaxEquilibrium ( talk) 13:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I will consider an introduction to Kosovo's constitutional history more than necessary. Its intricate situation compels us to let the reader know how it came about that Kosovo ratified its own constitution and under what laws it was governed during its previous status as a province of the Ottoman Empire of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia (split into three banovinas). Therefore, I am returning to the older version, which furthermore contains a source and I will add others.-- Getoar ( talk) 19:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Version without Getoar's data:
Version with Getoar's data:
a bit early for voting: try to carve out a compromise. For the time being, this article should be merged anyway, since it has practically no information. As soon as the new draft is out, of course, the article is going to be predominantly about that. dab (𒁳) 19:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
There are a lot of other constitutions which are missing and should be mentioned. This article should exist but include only the different constitutions under which its citizens were ruled. History should not be part of the article but one should start with the Roman Law (if there was one applied), the serb law, the ottoman law, the Kanun and then followed by the recent constitutions in the last 100 years (incl. the Kacanik one) up to the constitution which was signed today. Jawohl ( talk) 18:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
@ Dab, nothing should be merged here. Jawohl ( talk) 14:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
This article should not mention (except briefly in context) other constitutions, such as the 1974 or 1990 constitutions. If desired, separate articles can be created on those. Superm401 - Talk 02:29, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
The constitution...."providing a safer environment for all citizens of Kosovo." IDK about this statement.
Edwin Larkin ( talk) 15:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Can anybody specify what language(s) the original is in? The Evil Spartan ( talk) 23:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
I made some changes reflecting the status of the constitutional framework adopted under UNMIK. We don't have sources showing the answers to these questions and the article title encomasses both UNMIK/PISG and RoK. Alinor ( talk) 08:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
OK, so the UNMIK authorized the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government (PISG) per UNMIK Regulation 2001/9 of 15 May 2001. It explicitly provides that "laws, once promulgated, are binding legislative acts of a general nature", "the President shall sign each law adopted by the Assembly and forward it to the SRSG for promulgation" and "laws shall become effective on the day of their promulgation by the SRSG, unless otherwise specified." (The SRSG is the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Kosovo which actually issues these regulations and for which UNMIK functions.) Section 1.5 creates the Assembly and all the other institutions of the PISG, which did not exist prior to that, correct?
It was this PISG Assembly that adopted this Constitution of Kosovo of 9 April 2008? If regulation 2001/9 was still in effect, wouldn't the SRSG have promulgated this act? Does anyone have verification the 2008 Constitution was promulgated by the SRSG? Int21h ( talk) 21:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
The article seems to contain much overlap with this page, and might be merged here, and/or possibly Government of Kosovo, where sourced and appropriate. AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 01:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
This article was nominated for merging with Constitutional system in Kosovo on 01:09, 7 April 2014. The result of the discussion was Merge. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Constitution of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Constitution of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
The AfD closed with a decision to merge the above article with this one. As far as I can tell, the material from the source article is already in this one. Here [1] is a link to the source article just before it was converted to a redirect, should anyone want to see if there is additional material that needs to be moved over. Joyous! | Talk 21:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Constitution of Kosovo (1974) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 December 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Constitution of Kosovo. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
A news item involving Constitution of Kosovo was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 16 June 2008. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Constitution of Kosovo (1974) page were merged into Constitution of Kosovo on 11 February 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
A member of the
Guild of Copy Editors,
Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on June 23, 2014. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{
copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our
project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Merge proposal |
I don't wanna be the first to say it, but this article isn't exactly neutral POV. Firstly, if you decide to put history in the article, start from the beginning. Kosovo existed, and thus had a status of some sorts even before the 1800's, and it wasn't ruled by Turks since the beginning of time. And this is where come to the good part: phrases like "Kosovo was militarily occupied and then ceded to Serbia with the decision of the Great Powers.", "Kosovo declared its righteous secession", and such are, well... You know. Let's just say that in the first case the Serbs would say that Kosovo was liberated, and in the other that Albanian separatists committed an unlawful act. Statements like those do not belong to Wikipedia, or any other encyclopedia for that matter. There are many places out there to express opinions, but this is not one of these. I understand that these are turbulent times, but Wikipedia, as you surely know, is not a soapbox. Zhelja ( talk) 01:04, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Edwin Larkin ( talk) 15:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
"A new Constitution of Kosovo has been drafter and is expected to be ratified soon."
Should this say "drafted" rather than "drafter"? mdkarazim ( talk) 17:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
...Kosovo didn't receive before 1974. It especially didn't have in the 19th century, due to the fact that it was only formed in 1945. -- PaxEquilibrium ( talk) 13:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I will consider an introduction to Kosovo's constitutional history more than necessary. Its intricate situation compels us to let the reader know how it came about that Kosovo ratified its own constitution and under what laws it was governed during its previous status as a province of the Ottoman Empire of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia (split into three banovinas). Therefore, I am returning to the older version, which furthermore contains a source and I will add others.-- Getoar ( talk) 19:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Version without Getoar's data:
Version with Getoar's data:
a bit early for voting: try to carve out a compromise. For the time being, this article should be merged anyway, since it has practically no information. As soon as the new draft is out, of course, the article is going to be predominantly about that. dab (𒁳) 19:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
There are a lot of other constitutions which are missing and should be mentioned. This article should exist but include only the different constitutions under which its citizens were ruled. History should not be part of the article but one should start with the Roman Law (if there was one applied), the serb law, the ottoman law, the Kanun and then followed by the recent constitutions in the last 100 years (incl. the Kacanik one) up to the constitution which was signed today. Jawohl ( talk) 18:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
@ Dab, nothing should be merged here. Jawohl ( talk) 14:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
This article should not mention (except briefly in context) other constitutions, such as the 1974 or 1990 constitutions. If desired, separate articles can be created on those. Superm401 - Talk 02:29, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
The constitution...."providing a safer environment for all citizens of Kosovo." IDK about this statement.
Edwin Larkin ( talk) 15:20, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Can anybody specify what language(s) the original is in? The Evil Spartan ( talk) 23:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
I made some changes reflecting the status of the constitutional framework adopted under UNMIK. We don't have sources showing the answers to these questions and the article title encomasses both UNMIK/PISG and RoK. Alinor ( talk) 08:44, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
OK, so the UNMIK authorized the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government (PISG) per UNMIK Regulation 2001/9 of 15 May 2001. It explicitly provides that "laws, once promulgated, are binding legislative acts of a general nature", "the President shall sign each law adopted by the Assembly and forward it to the SRSG for promulgation" and "laws shall become effective on the day of their promulgation by the SRSG, unless otherwise specified." (The SRSG is the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Kosovo which actually issues these regulations and for which UNMIK functions.) Section 1.5 creates the Assembly and all the other institutions of the PISG, which did not exist prior to that, correct?
It was this PISG Assembly that adopted this Constitution of Kosovo of 9 April 2008? If regulation 2001/9 was still in effect, wouldn't the SRSG have promulgated this act? Does anyone have verification the 2008 Constitution was promulgated by the SRSG? Int21h ( talk) 21:37, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
The article seems to contain much overlap with this page, and might be merged here, and/or possibly Government of Kosovo, where sourced and appropriate. AdventurousSquirrel ( talk) 01:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
This article was nominated for merging with Constitutional system in Kosovo on 01:09, 7 April 2014. The result of the discussion was Merge. |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Constitution of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Constitution of Kosovo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
The AfD closed with a decision to merge the above article with this one. As far as I can tell, the material from the source article is already in this one. Here [1] is a link to the source article just before it was converted to a redirect, should anyone want to see if there is additional material that needs to be moved over. Joyous! | Talk 21:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)