A fact from Conolophus marthae appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 January 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,424 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/707860/pink-iguanas-found-on-galapagos-islands, this seems to be confirmed as a new species. Will try and do more in the coming days. So please dont delete the talk page for at least a week untill the article is done. Enlil Ninlil ( talk) 07:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Is it "vulnerable" or "critically endangered"? The infobox and text say different. Punkmorten ( talk) 13:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
The name of this article is misleading. Pink iguanas have not been formerly named, and when they are, they almost certainly won't be Conolophus rosada because combining a feminine species name with a masculine genus name violates the nomenclature rules. Nobody knows yet what it will be named. - 209.162.56.50 ( talk) 17:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
A fact from Conolophus marthae appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 15 January 2009, and was viewed approximately 1,424 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/world/707860/pink-iguanas-found-on-galapagos-islands, this seems to be confirmed as a new species. Will try and do more in the coming days. So please dont delete the talk page for at least a week untill the article is done. Enlil Ninlil ( talk) 07:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Is it "vulnerable" or "critically endangered"? The infobox and text say different. Punkmorten ( talk) 13:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
The name of this article is misleading. Pink iguanas have not been formerly named, and when they are, they almost certainly won't be Conolophus rosada because combining a feminine species name with a masculine genus name violates the nomenclature rules. Nobody knows yet what it will be named. - 209.162.56.50 ( talk) 17:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)