 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: consensus to move to Conning (company). ( non-admin closure) KSFT ( t| c) 22:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Conning & Company →
Conning (company) – incorrect legal business name
CCalcaterra1 (
talk) 17:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. —
Newslinger
talk
01:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request ( permalink). Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 22:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- @ CCalcaterra1, Retro, and Dicklyon: queried move request: Conning is a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 22:35, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- It seems unlikely this should replace the disambiguation; if the rationale is correct, perhaps Conning (company) is a better target. Retro ( talk | contribs) 19:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Did Conning do a name change? Sources like
this haven't caught up.
Dicklyon (
talk)
19:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Also, nom presented no evidence for the rationale "incorrect legal business name". Maybe Conning & Company is still the legal name, as well as the common name? Let's see some info, please. Dicklyon ( talk) 04:58, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Fixed template, no great objection. Conning appears to be current name. In ictu oculi ( talk) 08:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- The only parenthetically disambiguated articles in Category:Investment management companies of the United States are Brahma (company) and NRT (company), so this is at least consistent. Possibly premature, but perhaps it's not even worth looking for sources. I guess this new name will take off. (;-> And we move on. Andrewa ( talk) 06:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Start-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Articles edited by connected contributors
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
| The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
| The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: consensus to move to Conning (company). ( non-admin closure) KSFT ( t| c) 22:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Conning & Company →
Conning (company) – incorrect legal business name
CCalcaterra1 (
talk) 17:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. —
Newslinger
talk
01:27, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request ( permalink). Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 22:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- @ CCalcaterra1, Retro, and Dicklyon: queried move request: Conning is a disambig page. Anthony Appleyard ( talk) 22:35, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- It seems unlikely this should replace the disambiguation; if the rationale is correct, perhaps Conning (company) is a better target. Retro ( talk | contribs) 19:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Did Conning do a name change? Sources like
this haven't caught up.
Dicklyon (
talk)
19:34, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
- Also, nom presented no evidence for the rationale "incorrect legal business name". Maybe Conning & Company is still the legal name, as well as the common name? Let's see some info, please. Dicklyon ( talk) 04:58, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Fixed template, no great objection. Conning appears to be current name. In ictu oculi ( talk) 08:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- The only parenthetically disambiguated articles in Category:Investment management companies of the United States are Brahma (company) and NRT (company), so this is at least consistent. Possibly premature, but perhaps it's not even worth looking for sources. I guess this new name will take off. (;-> And we move on. Andrewa ( talk) 06:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Start-Class Finance & Investment articles
- Low-importance Finance & Investment articles
- WikiProject Finance & Investment articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Articles edited by connected contributors