![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To my knowledge, the rule the article is about is usually called "conjunction elimination", or "and elimination"; [1] I have never seen it called "simplification". The article had no references at all before 4 Mar 2012, when Gregbard gave at least three slovenly ones, which remained unimproved up to now. So since it's pretty impossible to verify the use of "simplification", that name shouldn't be claimed in the article, and the title should be renamed. After all, "simplification" is a rather general term which is "occupied" here without any verifiable source. - Jochen Burghardt ( talk) 12:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To my knowledge, the rule the article is about is usually called "conjunction elimination", or "and elimination"; [1] I have never seen it called "simplification". The article had no references at all before 4 Mar 2012, when Gregbard gave at least three slovenly ones, which remained unimproved up to now. So since it's pretty impossible to verify the use of "simplification", that name shouldn't be claimed in the article, and the title should be renamed. After all, "simplification" is a rather general term which is "occupied" here without any verifiable source. - Jochen Burghardt ( talk) 12:27, 31 January 2015 (UTC)