![]() | Denis Chicoine was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 July 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary. |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Tridentine Latin Rite Catholic Church. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 11#Tridentine Latin Rite Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Veverve (
talk)
07:16, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
The CMRI of 1967 to 1989 is so different than the group since then, that I wonder if it makes sense to create a different page, something like "CMRI history 1967 to 1989." Nearly all of the bad decisions, scandals, and issues with the group occurred before 1989. They've also changed a lot of their practices. I think it's unfair to the group now to display so much negative information on the page, when nearly all of the issues have been resolved and the group is really in a new time period. While many of the same people remain in the group today, clearly many of the problems should be pinned primary on Schuckardt, and also somewhat in the Chicoine transition era of 1984 to 1989. The early group had to deal with abusive priests, the anti-cult movement, and lawsuits that haven't been a reality of the group for over 30 years. Other outsiders have noted that it's unfair to compare the problems in the Schuckardt era of the 1970s with the current group. G4wa5r4gasag ( talk) 19:34, 2 August 2022 (UTC) — G4wa5r4gasag ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The WP:SPS were not adequate to document the canonical concepts which CMRI relies upon except to show that this is what they claim. I've copied cites from sedevacantism without being able to review them. Better still, sources might be derived from de:Ecclesia supplet, if you understand German. Elizium23 ( talk) 09:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
These two authors are trolling various Catholic pages and deleting everything. I don't know if they are paid, are part of the Catholic groups themselves, or are part of some government operation, but they clearly have no interest in expanding knowledge, but simply go onto pages, chop out huge amounts, and post absolutely trivial information. I've seen this across numerous pages, not just what I've worked on. Wikipedia is a lost cause, so I won't be making any other edits. G4wa5r4gasag ( talk) 21:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
St. Joseph's Catholic Church (Wayne, MI) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § St. Joseph's Catholic Church (Wayne, MI) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Veverve (
talk)
17:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
TLRCC and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § TLRCC until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Veverve (
talk)
17:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Latin Rite Catholic Church (splinter group) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § Latin Rite Catholic Church (splinter group) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Veverve (
talk)
17:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Veverve: My use of an article from the website "Traditional Mass" was rejected as "absolutely unreliable". While the website may be unreliable, the article in question is simply reporting a pamphlet written in 1993 by well-known sedevacantist priest Anthony Cekada, who is an authority on the issue. I ask wether I can use the article as a source, therefore.-- Karma1998 ( talk) 17:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Denis Chicoine was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 July 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Congregation of Mary Immaculate Queen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary. |
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 00:22, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Tridentine Latin Rite Catholic Church. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 11#Tridentine Latin Rite Catholic Church until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Veverve (
talk)
07:16, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
The CMRI of 1967 to 1989 is so different than the group since then, that I wonder if it makes sense to create a different page, something like "CMRI history 1967 to 1989." Nearly all of the bad decisions, scandals, and issues with the group occurred before 1989. They've also changed a lot of their practices. I think it's unfair to the group now to display so much negative information on the page, when nearly all of the issues have been resolved and the group is really in a new time period. While many of the same people remain in the group today, clearly many of the problems should be pinned primary on Schuckardt, and also somewhat in the Chicoine transition era of 1984 to 1989. The early group had to deal with abusive priests, the anti-cult movement, and lawsuits that haven't been a reality of the group for over 30 years. Other outsiders have noted that it's unfair to compare the problems in the Schuckardt era of the 1970s with the current group. G4wa5r4gasag ( talk) 19:34, 2 August 2022 (UTC) — G4wa5r4gasag ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
The WP:SPS were not adequate to document the canonical concepts which CMRI relies upon except to show that this is what they claim. I've copied cites from sedevacantism without being able to review them. Better still, sources might be derived from de:Ecclesia supplet, if you understand German. Elizium23 ( talk) 09:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
These two authors are trolling various Catholic pages and deleting everything. I don't know if they are paid, are part of the Catholic groups themselves, or are part of some government operation, but they clearly have no interest in expanding knowledge, but simply go onto pages, chop out huge amounts, and post absolutely trivial information. I've seen this across numerous pages, not just what I've worked on. Wikipedia is a lost cause, so I won't be making any other edits. G4wa5r4gasag ( talk) 21:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
St. Joseph's Catholic Church (Wayne, MI) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § St. Joseph's Catholic Church (Wayne, MI) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Veverve (
talk)
17:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
TLRCC and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § TLRCC until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Veverve (
talk)
17:32, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Latin Rite Catholic Church (splinter group) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 7 § Latin Rite Catholic Church (splinter group) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
Veverve (
talk)
17:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Veverve: My use of an article from the website "Traditional Mass" was rejected as "absolutely unreliable". While the website may be unreliable, the article in question is simply reporting a pamphlet written in 1993 by well-known sedevacantist priest Anthony Cekada, who is an authority on the issue. I ask wether I can use the article as a source, therefore.-- Karma1998 ( talk) 17:08, 29 January 2023 (UTC)