Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Gpeja I just removed major vandalism that appeared last night and I wanted to ask you to weigh in since I have a WP:COI and normally will not make direct edits. But this seemed an exigent circumstance, allowable since a single purpose account defaced the lead sentence of the article with an unsourced, extremely biased, false and highly damaging statement. 68.110.108.68 (this is the only edit ever from this account) inserted the following as the new lead:
"Conduit Ltd.' is a company that promotes spyware and malware. It claims to be..."
Given I have a COI, I would feel more comfortable if you could please weigh as to whether made the right decision. Thanks. BC1278 ( talk) 18:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)BC1278
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
I have a WP:COI here because I am a paid business consultant to Conduit. As such, I can't make direct edits without independent review.
Two very inflammatory statements have been added to the article with any citation.
"This toolbar is flagged by most antivirus software as potentially unwanted and adware. Conduit's toolbar software is often downloaded by malware packages from other publishers."
These statements are not factual, have not citation, and should be removed urgently. They are highly damaging to the company. BC1278 ( talk) 23:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)BC1278
References
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Gpeja I just removed major vandalism that appeared last night and I wanted to ask you to weigh in since I have a WP:COI and normally will not make direct edits. But this seemed an exigent circumstance, allowable since a single purpose account defaced the lead sentence of the article with an unsourced, extremely biased, false and highly damaging statement. 68.110.108.68 (this is the only edit ever from this account) inserted the following as the new lead:
"Conduit Ltd.' is a company that promotes spyware and malware. It claims to be..."
Given I have a COI, I would feel more comfortable if you could please weigh as to whether made the right decision. Thanks. BC1278 ( talk) 18:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)BC1278
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
I have a WP:COI here because I am a paid business consultant to Conduit. As such, I can't make direct edits without independent review.
Two very inflammatory statements have been added to the article with any citation.
"This toolbar is flagged by most antivirus software as potentially unwanted and adware. Conduit's toolbar software is often downloaded by malware packages from other publishers."
These statements are not factual, have not citation, and should be removed urgently. They are highly damaging to the company. BC1278 ( talk) 23:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)BC1278
References