This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Condor (APC) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There isn't much information on this vehicle available online, so if there's anyone who's had more experience with them, please feel free to fill in the blanks. Edward Sandstig 23:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
I heavily doubt about the truth of this information. The Condor is a small class 4x4 APC, and 2+12 is a number that only few of the biggest 8x8 APCs reach at all. Just compare some numbers:
4x4 Simba APC (a direct competitor of the Condor!): 2+8
6x6 Tpz Fuchs / Fox APC: 2+8 Saracen: 2+10
8x8 FNSS Pars / GPV Colonel: 2+12 Piranha IIIC: 2+11 MRAV Boxer: 2+9 Stryker: 2+9
I think it is impossible that the Condor carries 14 soldiers, even in it's pure APC version. With one of the weapon-turrets installed, it's transport capability should again be heavily reduced.
S.th. like 2+8 in the APC-version and 3+5 in the IFV-version should be much more realistic, but I'm afraid to say that I have no exact numbers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.129.216.106 ( talk • contribs) 13:54, November 19, 2006 (UCT).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Condor (APC). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Condor (APC) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There isn't much information on this vehicle available online, so if there's anyone who's had more experience with them, please feel free to fill in the blanks. Edward Sandstig 23:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
I heavily doubt about the truth of this information. The Condor is a small class 4x4 APC, and 2+12 is a number that only few of the biggest 8x8 APCs reach at all. Just compare some numbers:
4x4 Simba APC (a direct competitor of the Condor!): 2+8
6x6 Tpz Fuchs / Fox APC: 2+8 Saracen: 2+10
8x8 FNSS Pars / GPV Colonel: 2+12 Piranha IIIC: 2+11 MRAV Boxer: 2+9 Stryker: 2+9
I think it is impossible that the Condor carries 14 soldiers, even in it's pure APC version. With one of the weapon-turrets installed, it's transport capability should again be heavily reduced.
S.th. like 2+8 in the APC-version and 3+5 in the IFV-version should be much more realistic, but I'm afraid to say that I have no exact numbers. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.129.216.106 ( talk • contribs) 13:54, November 19, 2006 (UCT).
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Condor (APC). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC)