![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That was not quite the same: On 14 May 1912 Russia and Norway agreed that Svalbard Island is to be neutral territory (article now sort of a stub; word from Latin neuter, 'neither', in stead of by both). On 9 February 1920 the World Court awarded sovereignty to Norway. 14 August 1925 Formal assumption of sovereignty by Norway (Svalbard Territory). Fastifex 17:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
I just try to state the legal & historical facts, leaving every reader to 'think' what he likes, including you. However, I rather doubt whether the military and political stability of either contender at the time was the determining factor in the court's ruling (international courts are generally only seized when the parties have accepted to abide by the ruling), rather the historical dossiers presented that would not be changed- whether these lead to a 'just' decision I cannot say. Fastifex 20:54, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Why are there asterisks after Masstricht and Northern Dobruja? I cannot find anything on the page to indicate what they mean - and wikipedia doesn't generally use asterisk footnotes, if that's what they're supposed to point to. - DavidWBrooks 13:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
I have searched on the Moselle River condominium and found that it was created by treaty in 1816. (See reference in Fiat Objects. I also found it listed in Jan Kroghs website which lists enclaves/exclaves/neutral zones/Condominiums/etc in Europe.
There is also an extencive discussion of the condominium in BoundaryPoint group. See Message 3222, Message 3312, & Message 17254 and their replies. Severl people of the group also have gone on trips the condominium and created webpages Rolf Palmberg and GCEBE 2001 (Group Effort).
( Shocktm | Talk | contribs.) 13:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
I can't find explanation neighter in this article, nor in Aland. Alinor 06:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think this is true:
Roadrunner ( talk) 19:33, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Roadrunner ( talk) 09:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC) - can find no reference to this
The former New Hebrides was an Anglo-French condominium, with executive formally appointed by the King of Spain, which was problematic during the Second Spanish Republic and Francoist period. This should be covered. 75.216.20.178 ( talk) 22:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
I can find nothing that would suggest that Hadf is a condominium, nor anything else of a special nature. It seems to be simply a small town near Oman's main northern border. Google Maps and ACME Mapper do not show any border around Hadf, nor do they offer anything descriptive. GeoNames viewer shows Hadf as an Omani town. The Hadf Wikipedia article is a one-sentence stub that says nothing about a condominium.
Unless supporting detail is provided, I suggest deleting this entry from the list.
Jeff in CA 18:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Currently the article contains this statement:
This seems to be such an outlandish fantasy that it does not deserve to be mentioned in this article. Anyone up for removing it?
Jeff in CA 05:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
I've removed Brčko District from the list of current condominiums, because the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska are not sovereign states, and the article itself defines a condominium as "a political territory (state or border area) in or over which two or more sovereign powers formally agree to share equally...". The Office of the High Representative also dismisses the idea that Brčko is a condominium. There are, however, reliable sources that describe it as such. Some of these, however, clarify that it is a "quasi-condominium" or a "substate condominium" at odds with previous use of the concept. Cordless Larry ( talk) 09:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Wouldn't the Canal Zone qualify as an Panamerican condominium from 1979 to 1999? 174.137.217.177 ( talk) 22:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Condominium (international law). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Does the service tunnel qualify, as it's shared between the UK and France? REH11 ( talk) 18:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
The article defines a condominium as "a political territory in or over which multiple sovereign powers formally agree to share equal dominium and exercise their rights jointly, without dividing it into "national" zones."
Then the first example the article lists is Antarctica. Antarctica is divided into national zones, and thus, by this definition, is not a condominium.
Clarification needed - either the definition needs to be adjusted for accuracy, or Antarctica should be removed from the list.
Jade Phoenix Pence ( talk) 06:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Jade Phoenix Pence
Should Switzerland be removed from the first sentence? — Tamfang ( talk) 22:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
That was not quite the same: On 14 May 1912 Russia and Norway agreed that Svalbard Island is to be neutral territory (article now sort of a stub; word from Latin neuter, 'neither', in stead of by both). On 9 February 1920 the World Court awarded sovereignty to Norway. 14 August 1925 Formal assumption of sovereignty by Norway (Svalbard Territory). Fastifex 17:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
I just try to state the legal & historical facts, leaving every reader to 'think' what he likes, including you. However, I rather doubt whether the military and political stability of either contender at the time was the determining factor in the court's ruling (international courts are generally only seized when the parties have accepted to abide by the ruling), rather the historical dossiers presented that would not be changed- whether these lead to a 'just' decision I cannot say. Fastifex 20:54, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Why are there asterisks after Masstricht and Northern Dobruja? I cannot find anything on the page to indicate what they mean - and wikipedia doesn't generally use asterisk footnotes, if that's what they're supposed to point to. - DavidWBrooks 13:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
I have searched on the Moselle River condominium and found that it was created by treaty in 1816. (See reference in Fiat Objects. I also found it listed in Jan Kroghs website which lists enclaves/exclaves/neutral zones/Condominiums/etc in Europe.
There is also an extencive discussion of the condominium in BoundaryPoint group. See Message 3222, Message 3312, & Message 17254 and their replies. Severl people of the group also have gone on trips the condominium and created webpages Rolf Palmberg and GCEBE 2001 (Group Effort).
( Shocktm | Talk | contribs.) 13:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
I can't find explanation neighter in this article, nor in Aland. Alinor 06:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think this is true:
Roadrunner ( talk) 19:33, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Roadrunner ( talk) 09:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC) - can find no reference to this
The former New Hebrides was an Anglo-French condominium, with executive formally appointed by the King of Spain, which was problematic during the Second Spanish Republic and Francoist period. This should be covered. 75.216.20.178 ( talk) 22:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
I can find nothing that would suggest that Hadf is a condominium, nor anything else of a special nature. It seems to be simply a small town near Oman's main northern border. Google Maps and ACME Mapper do not show any border around Hadf, nor do they offer anything descriptive. GeoNames viewer shows Hadf as an Omani town. The Hadf Wikipedia article is a one-sentence stub that says nothing about a condominium.
Unless supporting detail is provided, I suggest deleting this entry from the list.
Jeff in CA 18:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Currently the article contains this statement:
This seems to be such an outlandish fantasy that it does not deserve to be mentioned in this article. Anyone up for removing it?
Jeff in CA 05:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
I've removed Brčko District from the list of current condominiums, because the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republika Srpska are not sovereign states, and the article itself defines a condominium as "a political territory (state or border area) in or over which two or more sovereign powers formally agree to share equally...". The Office of the High Representative also dismisses the idea that Brčko is a condominium. There are, however, reliable sources that describe it as such. Some of these, however, clarify that it is a "quasi-condominium" or a "substate condominium" at odds with previous use of the concept. Cordless Larry ( talk) 09:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Wouldn't the Canal Zone qualify as an Panamerican condominium from 1979 to 1999? 174.137.217.177 ( talk) 22:41, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Condominium (international law). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:59, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Does the service tunnel qualify, as it's shared between the UK and France? REH11 ( talk) 18:15, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
The article defines a condominium as "a political territory in or over which multiple sovereign powers formally agree to share equal dominium and exercise their rights jointly, without dividing it into "national" zones."
Then the first example the article lists is Antarctica. Antarctica is divided into national zones, and thus, by this definition, is not a condominium.
Clarification needed - either the definition needs to be adjusted for accuracy, or Antarctica should be removed from the list.
Jade Phoenix Pence ( talk) 06:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Jade Phoenix Pence
Should Switzerland be removed from the first sentence? — Tamfang ( talk) 22:02, 5 April 2023 (UTC)