![]() | Concrete bus shelters in Canberra has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 21, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Concrete bus shelters in Canberra appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 April 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Oceania's " 10,000 Challenge", which started in November 2016 and is still continuing. You can help! | ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ballpointbiro ( talk · contribs) 14:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm going to review this article today. Best,
Ballpointbiro (
talk)
14:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
The review is complete, I've picked up a few minor things that could be improved. Overall the article is really good, and does not need a lot of work to make GA status. Things to be improved for GA status are in bold italics. Suggestions for future improvements are in italics. Ballpointbiro ( talk) 16:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Nick-D: Sorry for the delay in getting back to this review, I was away for a few days. You've addressed all the issues I picked up, so I'm happy to give this article GA status. Congratulations! Ballpointbiro ( talk) 10:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk)
20:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Nick-D ( talk). Nominated by AllegedlyHuman ( talk) at 01:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Recently promoted GA. Length, overall article sourcing, and neutrality are assumed to have been covered during GAN. Hook is properly cited and interesting enough. Picture is properly licensed. QPQ is not needed as nominator is under 5 credits. I looked into whether the reporter in question was actually a reporter vs. a columnist, but it appears she was a reporter, so the word choice is appropriate.
My only suggestion would be to change "Canberra" to "Canberra, Australia", as it's not so prominent a city that we can assume readers will know the country. I see the article itself doesn't include the country in the lead, though, so just let me know the rationale if it was a considered deliberate decision. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 02:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Concrete bus shelters in Canberra has been listed as one of the
Engineering and technology good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 21, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Concrete bus shelters in Canberra appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 16 April 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Oceania's " 10,000 Challenge", which started in November 2016 and is still continuing. You can help! | ![]() |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Ballpointbiro ( talk · contribs) 14:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
I'm going to review this article today. Best,
Ballpointbiro (
talk)
14:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
The review is complete, I've picked up a few minor things that could be improved. Overall the article is really good, and does not need a lot of work to make GA status. Things to be improved for GA status are in bold italics. Suggestions for future improvements are in italics. Ballpointbiro ( talk) 16:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Nick-D: Sorry for the delay in getting back to this review, I was away for a few days. You've addressed all the issues I picked up, so I'm happy to give this article GA status. Congratulations! Ballpointbiro ( talk) 10:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk)
20:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Nick-D ( talk). Nominated by AllegedlyHuman ( talk) at 01:13, 22 March 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Recently promoted GA. Length, overall article sourcing, and neutrality are assumed to have been covered during GAN. Hook is properly cited and interesting enough. Picture is properly licensed. QPQ is not needed as nominator is under 5 credits. I looked into whether the reporter in question was actually a reporter vs. a columnist, but it appears she was a reporter, so the word choice is appropriate.
My only suggestion would be to change "Canberra" to "Canberra, Australia", as it's not so prominent a city that we can assume readers will know the country. I see the article itself doesn't include the country in the lead, though, so just let me know the rationale if it was a considered deliberate decision. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 02:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)