This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think someone should restructure the content written about compressed air in cans. It is written in a style that I have never seen on wikipedia, e.g. uses exclamation marks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.78.40.74 ( talk) 17:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Why does a can of dust destroyer - compressed gas duster get so cold when you use it?
Compressed air is in gas canassters and in deoderant bottles — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.37.248 ( talk) 14:36, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
This article could use a history section explaining when and how air compression was developed and improvements that have been made over time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.104.239.179 ( talk) 17:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Nothing about it's use as an intoxicating inhalant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.96.46 ( talk) 21:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
From Preikestolen:
Could something be written about canned air sold as novelties? -- Error ( talk) 20:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
References
|language=no
parameter inside the template, because it makes it a little more portable and opens up the possibility of tracking across all articles by a single change to the template itself. --
RexxS (
talk) 23:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Compressed air is not a "fuel" - this is not an article about propane or butane. Compressed air has a long and vital history as an energy transport medium in its own right and should not be subsumed in an ill-advised attempt to sneak in "carbon dioxide" in the same category. Mountains have been levelled by compressed air, CO2 is for pellet guns and seltzer bottles. -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 17:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
KVDP ( talk) 13:50, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
KVDP ( talk) 16:46, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. 86.149.141.8 ( talk) 16:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
The request to rename this article to Compressed air has been carried out. |
Compressed gas → Compressed air – restore long standing page title and subject of article after undiscussed, hasty, move Wtshymanski ( talk) 17:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Compressed air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
@ RexxS:, @ Wtshymanski: I fail to see the issue with including this in the lead? See also is a part of the page most readers will not see, and I see little downside adding a quick mention into the lead section. "Compressed Air Dusters" seems to be a pretty common usage, with the top results in Google Search for "compressed air" all returning canned air results. Shaded0 ( talk) 00:19, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents". Considering that gas dusters aka " canned air" are normally fluorocarbons, not air, I don't see how they can be considered one of the most important points for an article on compressed air, which all the sources in the article agree has no meaning other than air that has been compressed. The cans of gas are not even mentioned in this article, so I content it's hard to argue that they deserve to be part of the summary in the lead. Given that 10 percent of all industrial electricity in Europe is consumed in the production of compressed air, I seriously doubt that cans of compressed air used to blow dust out of computer keyboards make up more than an infinitesimal amount of usage of compressed air.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Compressed air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think someone should restructure the content written about compressed air in cans. It is written in a style that I have never seen on wikipedia, e.g. uses exclamation marks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.78.40.74 ( talk) 17:53, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Why does a can of dust destroyer - compressed gas duster get so cold when you use it?
Compressed air is in gas canassters and in deoderant bottles — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.37.248 ( talk) 14:36, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
This article could use a history section explaining when and how air compression was developed and improvements that have been made over time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.104.239.179 ( talk) 17:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Nothing about it's use as an intoxicating inhalant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.96.46 ( talk) 21:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
From Preikestolen:
Could something be written about canned air sold as novelties? -- Error ( talk) 20:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
References
|language=no
parameter inside the template, because it makes it a little more portable and opens up the possibility of tracking across all articles by a single change to the template itself. --
RexxS (
talk) 23:07, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Compressed air is not a "fuel" - this is not an article about propane or butane. Compressed air has a long and vital history as an energy transport medium in its own right and should not be subsumed in an ill-advised attempt to sneak in "carbon dioxide" in the same category. Mountains have been levelled by compressed air, CO2 is for pellet guns and seltzer bottles. -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 17:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
KVDP ( talk) 13:50, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
KVDP ( talk) 16:46, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: page moved. 86.149.141.8 ( talk) 16:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
The request to rename this article to Compressed air has been carried out. |
Compressed gas → Compressed air – restore long standing page title and subject of article after undiscussed, hasty, move Wtshymanski ( talk) 17:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Compressed air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
@ RexxS:, @ Wtshymanski: I fail to see the issue with including this in the lead? See also is a part of the page most readers will not see, and I see little downside adding a quick mention into the lead section. "Compressed Air Dusters" seems to be a pretty common usage, with the top results in Google Search for "compressed air" all returning canned air results. Shaded0 ( talk) 00:19, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents". Considering that gas dusters aka " canned air" are normally fluorocarbons, not air, I don't see how they can be considered one of the most important points for an article on compressed air, which all the sources in the article agree has no meaning other than air that has been compressed. The cans of gas are not even mentioned in this article, so I content it's hard to argue that they deserve to be part of the summary in the lead. Given that 10 percent of all industrial electricity in Europe is consumed in the production of compressed air, I seriously doubt that cans of compressed air used to blow dust out of computer keyboards make up more than an infinitesimal amount of usage of compressed air.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Compressed air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)