![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
there is only a scant amount of data on this page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by UberStein ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC).
This should be alphabetized. 209.150.54.42 04:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Need to update the information and cleanup a little... 209.150.54.42 04:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
WOWZA server if missing
FLV format is missing
need to add more systems and charts!
Also it seems flumotion isn't free —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.233.107.177 ( talk) 22:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC).
Is convenient to diference between unicast, multicast and P2PTV capabilities. -- Libero ( talk) 19:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
What is the purpose of the "Media Player" column in the "General" table? I believe that in its current form, this column is misleading. The servers stream videos using protocols such as RTMP and RTSP (details in the "Protocol support" table). Any player supporting a protocol served by the media server should be able to play streams from that media server. Currently, the table has a long list of players for Wowza (which supports RTMP and RTSP), and just says "any" player for Darwin (which does not support RTMP). This suggests that more players work with Darwin than with Wowza, which I believe to be incorrect. Could someone with more expertise assess this?
Meanwhile I will change "any" to "any with appropriate protocol support", and change the Wowza entry to read "any with appropriate protocol support, including..." -- 195.212.29.91 ( talk) 09:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Ain't you guys missing a few services on this list? What about places such as Livestream, Ustream, or Watchtail [1]? Or would they belong on some other list? -- 79.193.62.12 ( talk) 00:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
I also have a streaming server that I want to add to this list. I actually have 2 of them (one is open source, one is commercial). Every time I add them, they are undone because "lack of references". IMHO, this is completely unfair. I also saw another edits which were undone for other 3rd party servers. Don't want to make strong accusations, but this list is intentionally maintained with certain (commercial) values, despite the maintainer's claims of "purely informative, non-commercial" content. How is wowza non commercial for example? They even advertise the prices in here! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiretu ( talk • contribs) 17:04, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
there is only a scant amount of data on this page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by UberStein ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC).
This should be alphabetized. 209.150.54.42 04:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Need to update the information and cleanup a little... 209.150.54.42 04:42, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
WOWZA server if missing
FLV format is missing
need to add more systems and charts!
Also it seems flumotion isn't free —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.233.107.177 ( talk) 22:55, 4 August 2007 (UTC).
Is convenient to diference between unicast, multicast and P2PTV capabilities. -- Libero ( talk) 19:55, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
What is the purpose of the "Media Player" column in the "General" table? I believe that in its current form, this column is misleading. The servers stream videos using protocols such as RTMP and RTSP (details in the "Protocol support" table). Any player supporting a protocol served by the media server should be able to play streams from that media server. Currently, the table has a long list of players for Wowza (which supports RTMP and RTSP), and just says "any" player for Darwin (which does not support RTMP). This suggests that more players work with Darwin than with Wowza, which I believe to be incorrect. Could someone with more expertise assess this?
Meanwhile I will change "any" to "any with appropriate protocol support", and change the Wowza entry to read "any with appropriate protocol support, including..." -- 195.212.29.91 ( talk) 09:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Ain't you guys missing a few services on this list? What about places such as Livestream, Ustream, or Watchtail [1]? Or would they belong on some other list? -- 79.193.62.12 ( talk) 00:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
I also have a streaming server that I want to add to this list. I actually have 2 of them (one is open source, one is commercial). Every time I add them, they are undone because "lack of references". IMHO, this is completely unfair. I also saw another edits which were undone for other 3rd party servers. Don't want to make strong accusations, but this list is intentionally maintained with certain (commercial) values, despite the maintainer's claims of "purely informative, non-commercial" content. How is wowza non commercial for example? They even advertise the prices in here! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shiretu ( talk • contribs) 17:04, 27 July 2013 (UTC)