This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

• I have added citations to the article so people can find the necessary information but the majority of this article seems to be copy/pasted from http://www.computinghistory.org.uk/ and needs to be reworded or new information added. MBlairMartin ( talk) 21:47, 6 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Aren't EISA slots always 32-bit? Indeed, isn't that the whole point of EISA? — 209.249.190.124 ( talk) 18:38, 22 January 2020 (UTC) reply

The math of "seven months later" vs. "by almost a year" doesn't check out. See the paragraph linking reference 13 and 14.

I suggest sales ads in computer magazines as a more reliable source of release dates of the two machines. Many references here are self-published.

Henrik Erlandsson 18:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)