This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The image Image:Communion book cover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
A tag now says:
Clearly this book is fictional one, or does anybody think otherwise? 90.224.68.197 ( talk) 21:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
The New York Times classified it as such (rising to #1 on the Non-Fiction Bestsellers), as did the book's publisher. To qualify it otherwise is to apply one's opinion to the article. Whether or not you agree with its classification is a completely different issue, since the fact remains that it has already been classified as Non-Fiction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aranarak ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Strieber claims communion was the object of ridicule by the southpark show's pilot episode, he claims the creators were very proud they were able to avoid legal action by streiber. This was discussed on Art Bell's Dark Matter 10/1/13 , I dont have a reference to the article streiber referenced where the south park creators claimed communion was being parodied in the pilot so I did not add the link, if anyone has it they should probably add a reference under pop culture — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.103.144.2 ( talk) 20:12, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Communion (book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
The image Image:Communion book cover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
A tag now says:
Clearly this book is fictional one, or does anybody think otherwise? 90.224.68.197 ( talk) 21:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
The New York Times classified it as such (rising to #1 on the Non-Fiction Bestsellers), as did the book's publisher. To qualify it otherwise is to apply one's opinion to the article. Whether or not you agree with its classification is a completely different issue, since the fact remains that it has already been classified as Non-Fiction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aranarak ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Strieber claims communion was the object of ridicule by the southpark show's pilot episode, he claims the creators were very proud they were able to avoid legal action by streiber. This was discussed on Art Bell's Dark Matter 10/1/13 , I dont have a reference to the article streiber referenced where the south park creators claimed communion was being parodied in the pilot so I did not add the link, if anyone has it they should probably add a reference under pop culture — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.103.144.2 ( talk) 20:12, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Communion (book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)