This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Hello! I want to give a heads up that I will be editing this page for a grad class at Georgetown's CCT program (please see bar above). I would appreciate any help and input you have. Thanks! Bb437 ( talk) 16:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
These comments have been addressed in the article. The title is now Communicative Constitution of Organizations and the use of "framework" is now limited to within perspectives/schools. Additional work is still needed to improve this article. Cameronpiercy ( talk) 18:45, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi everyone. I would like to suggest a series of changes so that this article better reflects the diversity of work being done under the CCO banner.
I second that. Page should be called Communicative Constitution of Organization -- 20:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
I agree. Page should be called Communicative Constitution of Organization Cameronpiercy ( talk) 15:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Again, I can only agree. CCO is a perspective with (at least) three distinct schools of thought. -- Steffen Blaschke ( talk) 20:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
I guess I better start doing the work now! -- WikipedianTomM ( talk) 21:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
I agree that this page should be called Communicative Constitution of Organization — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.91.36.103 ( talk) 19:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Georgetown University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
16:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Hello! I want to give a heads up that I will be editing this page for a grad class at Georgetown's CCT program (please see bar above). I would appreciate any help and input you have. Thanks! Bb437 ( talk) 16:45, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
These comments have been addressed in the article. The title is now Communicative Constitution of Organizations and the use of "framework" is now limited to within perspectives/schools. Additional work is still needed to improve this article. Cameronpiercy ( talk) 18:45, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi everyone. I would like to suggest a series of changes so that this article better reflects the diversity of work being done under the CCO banner.
I second that. Page should be called Communicative Constitution of Organization -- 20:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
I agree. Page should be called Communicative Constitution of Organization Cameronpiercy ( talk) 15:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Again, I can only agree. CCO is a perspective with (at least) three distinct schools of thought. -- Steffen Blaschke ( talk) 20:27, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
I guess I better start doing the work now! -- WikipedianTomM ( talk) 21:10, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
I agree that this page should be called Communicative Constitution of Organization — Preceding unsigned comment added by 153.91.36.103 ( talk) 19:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Georgetown University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
16:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)