This article was nominated for deletion on 2 May 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Commonwealth free trade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. After two full listing periods, there are no support votes other than the nom, and one oppose. Oppose seems legitimate as well - the current article is long enough and focused on free trade, so there seems no reason to expand it; a separate article can be created if desired. ( non-admin closure) — Amakuru ( talk) 11:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Commonwealth free trade →
Economy of the Commonwealth of Nations – Expand the article to the economy of the Commonwealth.--Relisted. --
Mdann
52
talk to me! 13:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
86.138.14.247 (
talk)
01:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
I think it is better to expand this article to include the freedom of movement of the factors of production within the Commonwealth, including the figures of the imports and exports of the member states. This information is related to free trade but is better described as the economy of the Commonwealth. 86.138.14.247 ( talk) 02:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
If an objective editor were to start deleting unreferenced arguments/sentences/paragraphs in this article, there would soon be no article at all. Will return and delete more some time later. If you are knowledgeable in this area please edit and reference. Juan Riley ( talk) 22:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
The recent decision of the UK to leave the European Union has brought further attention to the concept of a Commonwealth Free Trade Agreement. We can say this after only a day or afew days? -Serialjoepsycho- ( talk) 21:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Commonwealth free trade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:43, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 May 2023. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Commonwealth free trade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. After two full listing periods, there are no support votes other than the nom, and one oppose. Oppose seems legitimate as well - the current article is long enough and focused on free trade, so there seems no reason to expand it; a separate article can be created if desired. ( non-admin closure) — Amakuru ( talk) 11:22, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
Commonwealth free trade →
Economy of the Commonwealth of Nations – Expand the article to the economy of the Commonwealth.--Relisted. --
Mdann
52
talk to me! 13:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
86.138.14.247 (
talk)
01:33, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
I think it is better to expand this article to include the freedom of movement of the factors of production within the Commonwealth, including the figures of the imports and exports of the member states. This information is related to free trade but is better described as the economy of the Commonwealth. 86.138.14.247 ( talk) 02:43, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
If an objective editor were to start deleting unreferenced arguments/sentences/paragraphs in this article, there would soon be no article at all. Will return and delete more some time later. If you are knowledgeable in this area please edit and reference. Juan Riley ( talk) 22:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
The recent decision of the UK to leave the European Union has brought further attention to the concept of a Commonwealth Free Trade Agreement. We can say this after only a day or afew days? -Serialjoepsycho- ( talk) 21:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Commonwealth free trade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:43, 11 August 2017 (UTC)