This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Commercial Lunar Payload Services article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Noosphere Ventures does not have a Wikipedia page but Noosphere does. Either the Noosphere page needs renaming or the edit to CLPS needs reverting. To resolve external evidence needed. Andrew Swallow ( talk) 03:02, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
I think this article should link to resupply rather than COTS because, as far as I know, CLPS does not pay for the development of landers. It does however pay for missions. Lunar CATALYST was the development project. There is a second project for the development of larger landers. Andrew Swallow ( talk) 19:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
The contractors selected have strong partnerships and working agreements between themselves, as required by the nature of this program, and it is proposed that the lander designed by Intuitive Machines ( Nova-C) will be the lander to be proposed for the first mission. Ahead of the bidding and contracts, the timeline is such that Intuitive Machines is already hoping for a June 2021 launch. I tried to word that lander's article to reflect that no transport contract has yet been signed; but if you can improve the text to that effect it would be great. Cheers, Rowan Forest ( talk) 15:50, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
The winners of the first lander contracts will be announced "in a few days": [1]. That section is not outdated yet. Rowan Forest ( talk) 17:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Can we add something about masses and costs ? eg what mass payload of the various landers? or what mass for the NASA payloads ? Did NASA give any target price per kg landed ? Do the NASA awards cover all costs ? who pays for the non NASA payloads ? -
Rod57 (
talk)
15:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
References
On 3 December 2020 NAS "selected" five companies to "collect lunar resources" . [2] the companies are: Lunar Outpost of Golden, Colorado; Masten Space Systems of Mojave, California; ispace Europe of Luxembourg; and ispace Japan of Tokyo. Is this part of the CLPS program? If so, we need to add it here. - Arch dude ( talk) 17:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
CADRE is missing from the IM-3 payload manifest. See here: https://science.nasa.gov/lunar-science/clps-deliveries/cp-11/
Editors are encouraged to participate in the discussion at: Talk:List of Artemis missions#Lists of CLPS missions. ( — 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 03:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
The table of missions, IMO, would be easier to read if the Awarded column was swapped with the Launch column. Then related details would be adjacent, and it reads better left to right chronologically.
Total mass of payloads could be in the notes column, or have its own new column. -
Rod57 (
talk)
11:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Given that IM-1 fell on its side (but had soft landed and was still able to carry out its scientific objectives) I think it would count as a partial success. 102.223.59.149 ( talk) 10:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Commercial Lunar Payload Services article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Noosphere Ventures does not have a Wikipedia page but Noosphere does. Either the Noosphere page needs renaming or the edit to CLPS needs reverting. To resolve external evidence needed. Andrew Swallow ( talk) 03:02, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
I think this article should link to resupply rather than COTS because, as far as I know, CLPS does not pay for the development of landers. It does however pay for missions. Lunar CATALYST was the development project. There is a second project for the development of larger landers. Andrew Swallow ( talk) 19:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
The contractors selected have strong partnerships and working agreements between themselves, as required by the nature of this program, and it is proposed that the lander designed by Intuitive Machines ( Nova-C) will be the lander to be proposed for the first mission. Ahead of the bidding and contracts, the timeline is such that Intuitive Machines is already hoping for a June 2021 launch. I tried to word that lander's article to reflect that no transport contract has yet been signed; but if you can improve the text to that effect it would be great. Cheers, Rowan Forest ( talk) 15:50, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
The winners of the first lander contracts will be announced "in a few days": [1]. That section is not outdated yet. Rowan Forest ( talk) 17:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Can we add something about masses and costs ? eg what mass payload of the various landers? or what mass for the NASA payloads ? Did NASA give any target price per kg landed ? Do the NASA awards cover all costs ? who pays for the non NASA payloads ? -
Rod57 (
talk)
15:53, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
References
On 3 December 2020 NAS "selected" five companies to "collect lunar resources" . [2] the companies are: Lunar Outpost of Golden, Colorado; Masten Space Systems of Mojave, California; ispace Europe of Luxembourg; and ispace Japan of Tokyo. Is this part of the CLPS program? If so, we need to add it here. - Arch dude ( talk) 17:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
CADRE is missing from the IM-3 payload manifest. See here: https://science.nasa.gov/lunar-science/clps-deliveries/cp-11/
Editors are encouraged to participate in the discussion at: Talk:List of Artemis missions#Lists of CLPS missions. ( — 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 03:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
The table of missions, IMO, would be easier to read if the Awarded column was swapped with the Launch column. Then related details would be adjacent, and it reads better left to right chronologically.
Total mass of payloads could be in the notes column, or have its own new column. -
Rod57 (
talk)
11:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Given that IM-1 fell on its side (but had soft landed and was still able to carry out its scientific objectives) I think it would count as a partial success. 102.223.59.149 ( talk) 10:39, 27 June 2024 (UTC)