![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
The expansion to Tiberian Sun.. did it not explain how Kane would be back? The ending cinematic showed a cloning facility of some sorts, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.109.216.176 ( talk • contribs) 05:25, 19 April 2006
Kane, due to the biblical references, supposedly has 7 lives in total. During those 7 lives he will "re-incarnate". The ending of Firestorm showed Cabal and Kane beeing sort of "merged." And speaking of merging, this article should be merged with the Tiberian Twilight one considering it's the same page. However information from both should be kept as it can be used to inform of the early stages of the game. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.167.96.195 ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 19 April 2006 (UTC).
"Last installment"? if it were called Tiberian Twilight, maybe, but not with a name like Tiberium Wars —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.64.43 ( talk • contribs) 23:25, 19 April 2006 (UTC).
I dont care if they make more games, I just want them to be worth playing NODfanatic 17:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Dear lord, please let EA not fuck this one up, like they fucked up Renegade and Generals... amen. Ghostalker 02:32, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree EA did fucked up Generals. The gameplay seems like a Warcraft rip off. I also hope they don't mess this one up. They better use Joseph D. Kucan as Kane.
Better than nothing mate! Dfrg.msc 07:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks to Ghoststalker, I now have a new userbox! Check it out:
C&C3 | This user is praying The EA Prayer. |
TomStar81 05:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Dfrg.msc 07:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I liked generals....... Zerath13
I liked generals too. What's wrong with it? It's a fun game.-- Taida 01:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
I think this section should be incorporated into the main Command and Conquer (series) article, as it doesn't really say much about Command and Conquer 3 itself. Anyone else agree? The_B 14:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Ghostalker 03:23, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Dfrg.msc 06:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I contacted him, this is his quote:
"On another note, I've been getting a lot of emails asking me if I'm doing the music for the newly annouced C&C3, so I'd thought I make a quick post for the record to say the annoucement was the first I've heard of it, like everyone else.
Not sure they would ask since I'm full time at Petroglyph anyways...
Be interesting to see what they do with it." -* The Hypnotist
Dfrg.msc 07:48, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Is it me, or does "Tiberium Wars" Sound a little boring? I mean, they could've at least named it Tiberian wars. Or, something other than the word wars. Cause, it's been a war with tiberium for the last two games. The Hypnotist
I think it might just be a working name like commando or Jar Jars big adventure.
I'm still quietly hoping eventually the game will be called Tiberian Twilight, and that this is just a working title. However, that would make sense, so EA will probably ignore it all together :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Crashmatrix ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC).
Who cares? Its C&C! Does the name matter when your Ion cannon obiterates their oblsek and you roll over their base with twenety
Mamoth tanks? C&c!
Dfrg.msc
06:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
What's with the wheat picture? and what "you ripped me off, where's my radio" mean? 81.109.94.62 21:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
I think it should be moved to the Generals article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.174.135.175 ( talk • contribs) 17:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC).
THere going to have a mobile base. And merging units. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jamhaw ( talk • contribs) 14:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC).
I know that The Forgotten were in Tiberian Sun, but I do not remeber seeing them in Renegade. Did I miss something, or are the recipiants of and participants of Project Regenisis considered members of The Forgotten? And if The Forgotten are not in Renegade why does The Forgotten entry in the section Third Side Speculation mention them in Renegade? TomStar81 04:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Tiberian Sun is in 2030, Renegade in 1995
FMV only means it has motion is it going to be actors or CGI if it's actors it should say Live Action.
Joe Kucan deserves his own article not just a redirect to Kane he has done a lot more than be Kane. Jamhaw 14:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)jamhaw
If I am reading the unit preview right, certain vehicals could be equiped with upgrades. That was not possible in any of the other C&C specific games, was it? TomStar81 03:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, it was possible in C&C Generals and Zero Hour where for instance, the Overlord tank could be upgraded with the battle bunker upgrade, the speaker tower upgrade or the gatling cannon upgrade. Gunman47 05:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
rules.ini
:).
Voice-of-All
08:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Anyone here with some webspace that wants to mirror that .avi file? I don't know how much longer it can stay on the server :( It's a home-made (high quality) conversion from inferior MOV format to the universal AVI, so I doubt its being hosted on say... IGN or FilePlanet. Ghostalker 01:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Is this section really necssary? I'll be honest, to me it looks like some jaded C&C fan complaining over Generals again.
I thought Generals was good, by the way. Someguy-021 05:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Someguy-021
Ghostalker 01:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
the original section clearly breakes npov so if you dont mind, ill add mine here. i have played many many games in the c&c series and let me tell you many of them were good but many were medicore. tiberian sun imho simply was bordering a bad game. why? because after ra there was nothing nothing new and not only that the games were strategically lacking which made multiplayer unfeasible. multiplayer had very bad unit balance and very bad preparations in terms of economy and base expansion. the truth is that c&c was a single player experience. thats why im against your rant because although generals was not such a spectacular game because to much extent it did copy on blizzard and they released an unfinished product performance wise it tried to innovate. ea has 2 options, stick to a formulah that was proven to produce bad results which will make many people not to buy it or adapt and innovate.personally,im very glad they did a contextual sidebar. the truth is that the innovator wins as long as the game is polished and if they want to create a good title that has some chance hurting the beast that is warcraft 3 before starcraft 2 comes out and nukes every other strategy game they will surely do just that. Nightybeta
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
The expansion to Tiberian Sun.. did it not explain how Kane would be back? The ending cinematic showed a cloning facility of some sorts, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.109.216.176 ( talk • contribs) 05:25, 19 April 2006
Kane, due to the biblical references, supposedly has 7 lives in total. During those 7 lives he will "re-incarnate". The ending of Firestorm showed Cabal and Kane beeing sort of "merged." And speaking of merging, this article should be merged with the Tiberian Twilight one considering it's the same page. However information from both should be kept as it can be used to inform of the early stages of the game. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.167.96.195 ( talk • contribs) 19:33, 19 April 2006 (UTC).
"Last installment"? if it were called Tiberian Twilight, maybe, but not with a name like Tiberium Wars —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.135.64.43 ( talk • contribs) 23:25, 19 April 2006 (UTC).
I dont care if they make more games, I just want them to be worth playing NODfanatic 17:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Dear lord, please let EA not fuck this one up, like they fucked up Renegade and Generals... amen. Ghostalker 02:32, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree EA did fucked up Generals. The gameplay seems like a Warcraft rip off. I also hope they don't mess this one up. They better use Joseph D. Kucan as Kane.
Better than nothing mate! Dfrg.msc 07:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks to Ghoststalker, I now have a new userbox! Check it out:
C&C3 | This user is praying The EA Prayer. |
TomStar81 05:17, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Dfrg.msc 07:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
I liked generals....... Zerath13
I liked generals too. What's wrong with it? It's a fun game.-- Taida 01:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
I think this section should be incorporated into the main Command and Conquer (series) article, as it doesn't really say much about Command and Conquer 3 itself. Anyone else agree? The_B 14:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Ghostalker 03:23, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Dfrg.msc 06:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
I contacted him, this is his quote:
"On another note, I've been getting a lot of emails asking me if I'm doing the music for the newly annouced C&C3, so I'd thought I make a quick post for the record to say the annoucement was the first I've heard of it, like everyone else.
Not sure they would ask since I'm full time at Petroglyph anyways...
Be interesting to see what they do with it." -* The Hypnotist
Dfrg.msc 07:48, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Is it me, or does "Tiberium Wars" Sound a little boring? I mean, they could've at least named it Tiberian wars. Or, something other than the word wars. Cause, it's been a war with tiberium for the last two games. The Hypnotist
I think it might just be a working name like commando or Jar Jars big adventure.
I'm still quietly hoping eventually the game will be called Tiberian Twilight, and that this is just a working title. However, that would make sense, so EA will probably ignore it all together :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Crashmatrix ( talk • contribs) 22:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC).
Who cares? Its C&C! Does the name matter when your Ion cannon obiterates their oblsek and you roll over their base with twenety
Mamoth tanks? C&c!
Dfrg.msc
06:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
What's with the wheat picture? and what "you ripped me off, where's my radio" mean? 81.109.94.62 21:17, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
I think it should be moved to the Generals article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.174.135.175 ( talk • contribs) 17:16, 1 May 2006 (UTC).
THere going to have a mobile base. And merging units. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jamhaw ( talk • contribs) 14:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC).
I know that The Forgotten were in Tiberian Sun, but I do not remeber seeing them in Renegade. Did I miss something, or are the recipiants of and participants of Project Regenisis considered members of The Forgotten? And if The Forgotten are not in Renegade why does The Forgotten entry in the section Third Side Speculation mention them in Renegade? TomStar81 04:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Tiberian Sun is in 2030, Renegade in 1995
FMV only means it has motion is it going to be actors or CGI if it's actors it should say Live Action.
Joe Kucan deserves his own article not just a redirect to Kane he has done a lot more than be Kane. Jamhaw 14:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)jamhaw
If I am reading the unit preview right, certain vehicals could be equiped with upgrades. That was not possible in any of the other C&C specific games, was it? TomStar81 03:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Well, it was possible in C&C Generals and Zero Hour where for instance, the Overlord tank could be upgraded with the battle bunker upgrade, the speaker tower upgrade or the gatling cannon upgrade. Gunman47 05:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
rules.ini
:).
Voice-of-All
08:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Anyone here with some webspace that wants to mirror that .avi file? I don't know how much longer it can stay on the server :( It's a home-made (high quality) conversion from inferior MOV format to the universal AVI, so I doubt its being hosted on say... IGN or FilePlanet. Ghostalker 01:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Is this section really necssary? I'll be honest, to me it looks like some jaded C&C fan complaining over Generals again.
I thought Generals was good, by the way. Someguy-021 05:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC)Someguy-021
Ghostalker 01:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
the original section clearly breakes npov so if you dont mind, ill add mine here. i have played many many games in the c&c series and let me tell you many of them were good but many were medicore. tiberian sun imho simply was bordering a bad game. why? because after ra there was nothing nothing new and not only that the games were strategically lacking which made multiplayer unfeasible. multiplayer had very bad unit balance and very bad preparations in terms of economy and base expansion. the truth is that c&c was a single player experience. thats why im against your rant because although generals was not such a spectacular game because to much extent it did copy on blizzard and they released an unfinished product performance wise it tried to innovate. ea has 2 options, stick to a formulah that was proven to produce bad results which will make many people not to buy it or adapt and innovate.personally,im very glad they did a contextual sidebar. the truth is that the innovator wins as long as the game is polished and if they want to create a good title that has some chance hurting the beast that is warcraft 3 before starcraft 2 comes out and nukes every other strategy game they will surely do just that. Nightybeta