- This is not my usual hang-out, but I just wanted to note, as I have addressed on the talk page, that the infobox does not conform to project standards for formatting of reviews. I have pointed out the difference at the article talk page. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- There should be a Reception section.
- Can a Production section be added/expanded in the article?
- Break up General and Specific references in the " References" section with subheadings using ;General formatting.
- "See also" section goes before "References" per WP:LAYOUT.
- Use en dashes for date ranges, like in the infobox, per WP:DASH.
Gary King ( talk) 22:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Because there has been no discussion from the article's editors here and some of the issues remain unresolved, and in addition, 7 days have passed, this article has failed. Gary King ( talk) 21:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- This is not my usual hang-out, but I just wanted to note, as I have addressed on the talk page, that the infobox does not conform to project standards for formatting of reviews. I have pointed out the difference at the article talk page. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- There should be a Reception section.
- Can a Production section be added/expanded in the article?
- Break up General and Specific references in the " References" section with subheadings using ;General formatting.
- "See also" section goes before "References" per WP:LAYOUT.
- Use en dashes for date ranges, like in the infobox, per WP:DASH.
Gary King ( talk) 22:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Because there has been no discussion from the article's editors here and some of the issues remain unresolved, and in addition, 7 days have passed, this article has failed. Gary King ( talk) 21:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)