This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Coltrane for Lovers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Coltrane for Lovers has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Note that Prestige released an LP, "Coltrane Plays for Lovers." This is a collection of (previously released) Prestige material, hence has none of the material on the CD. However, this might cause some confusion. Impulse did put out a similar collection, "The Gentle Side of John Coltrane," although it also had a different playlist.
Not sure if any of this should be in the article. Editor437 ( talk) 22:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Not sure if this is quite the case -- it seems to be only the cited-article's opinion - not Coltrane or Impulse's. Lewis Porter's biography (see esp. page 196) says it has more to do with mouthpiece problems than the need to become "commercial." Editor437 ( talk) 22:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
This article does not utilize proper formatting in the infobox according to the standards of its primary wikiproject. The proper formatting for reviews is:
This article has been altered to this:
While "citeweb" is quite useful for citing facts within an article, this does not conform to project standards. See here for more. Additionally, when listing this particular source in articles, there is a template for the purpose, which can be found at {{ allmusic}}. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Dan56 A good article, The Documentary, features citations instead of links for the professional reviews section of the infobox. Why?
This review is transcluded from Talk:Coltrane for Lovers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Gary King ( talk) 22:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I will start reviewing now. Updates will be posted soon I hope. So# Why review me! 08:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Let's see, a couple of things:
Well, that's all I could find for now. I will put it on hold now until this has been fixed. It looks good otherwise imho. Please write into my list above when you did fix something and if possible and not too tedious, do so with a editing diff (e.g. ":Fixed by adding source ( diff)). So# Why review me! 09:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I can't find any more information on production.
Dan56 (
talk)
01:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
I replaced the Amazon.com source, reworded the chart history section, and added another category. Dan56 ( talk) 19:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
As far as I can judge it, this article now passes these criteria. Will promote it to GA. So Why 20:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Coltrane for Lovers. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Coltrane for Lovers/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
All the start class criteria A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details |
Last edited at 22:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 12:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Coltrane for Lovers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Coltrane for Lovers has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Note that Prestige released an LP, "Coltrane Plays for Lovers." This is a collection of (previously released) Prestige material, hence has none of the material on the CD. However, this might cause some confusion. Impulse did put out a similar collection, "The Gentle Side of John Coltrane," although it also had a different playlist.
Not sure if any of this should be in the article. Editor437 ( talk) 22:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Not sure if this is quite the case -- it seems to be only the cited-article's opinion - not Coltrane or Impulse's. Lewis Porter's biography (see esp. page 196) says it has more to do with mouthpiece problems than the need to become "commercial." Editor437 ( talk) 22:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
This article does not utilize proper formatting in the infobox according to the standards of its primary wikiproject. The proper formatting for reviews is:
This article has been altered to this:
While "citeweb" is quite useful for citing facts within an article, this does not conform to project standards. See here for more. Additionally, when listing this particular source in articles, there is a template for the purpose, which can be found at {{ allmusic}}. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:54, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Dan56 A good article, The Documentary, features citations instead of links for the professional reviews section of the infobox. Why?
This review is transcluded from Talk:Coltrane for Lovers/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Gary King ( talk) 22:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
I will start reviewing now. Updates will be posted soon I hope. So# Why review me! 08:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Let's see, a couple of things:
Well, that's all I could find for now. I will put it on hold now until this has been fixed. It looks good otherwise imho. Please write into my list above when you did fix something and if possible and not too tedious, do so with a editing diff (e.g. ":Fixed by adding source ( diff)). So# Why review me! 09:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
I can't find any more information on production.
Dan56 (
talk)
01:02, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
I replaced the Amazon.com source, reworded the chart history section, and added another category. Dan56 ( talk) 19:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
As far as I can judge it, this article now passes these criteria. Will promote it to GA. So Why 20:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
References
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Coltrane for Lovers. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Coltrane for Lovers/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
All the start class criteria A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details |
Last edited at 22:37, 26 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 12:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)