This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are there any sourced for this content that isn't from YouTube? If we can meet standard sourcing and verification policies, then this content should be fine. But as it was, I've moved it here. Please feel free to discuss further, or work on sourcing. Thanks!- Andrew c [talk] 19:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Furthermore, source [1] list "America Right to Life" not CRtL, so it would be off topic in this article anyway.- Andrew c [talk] 22:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Andrew, thank you for checking for accuracy, but the first Youtube citation is a recording of an actual news broadcast, so there should be no question of its authenticity or independence as a source. It's simply in video form, and hosted on Youtube for convenience. The second item is sourced elsewhere, and I've added two more citations, including one from a widely recognized and respected major newsmagazine with nationwide circulation. I'll add a note that both CRTL and American Right to Life hosted Power in the Park.
Rensslaer c
[talk]
18:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
The Worldmag article mentions a black pro-life event at Martin Luther King Jr. Park, and says it's right next door to the abortion center. That information alone should be sufficient to establish it's talking about the same event referenced.
As for American Right to Life, it was founded by Colorado Right to Life, and should have its own article on Wikipedia, it just doesn't yet. Any efforts by ARTL in Colorado are generally and by definition done through their affiliate, Colorado Right to Life, though they use the bigger name -- American Right to Life -- to connote that it's an event with national significance.
I added more citations to try to please you -- the one citation indicates the event happened, the other citation indicates more detail on what the event was, and the video provides on-the-spot verification of what was said.
Do you have a reference that Youtube is not considered valid for any reason? I read through the rules yesterday and I certainly did not see that. Youtube is a video reference service where you can see stuff that actually happened, and as far as I know it's the only streamable place where you can still view the 9News media coverage. If I need to cite a news source for verification, why not cite their actual streamable video, no matter the source? You're not suggesting it's faked, surely. Rensslaer ( talk) 20:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Are there any sourced for this content that isn't from YouTube? If we can meet standard sourcing and verification policies, then this content should be fine. But as it was, I've moved it here. Please feel free to discuss further, or work on sourcing. Thanks!- Andrew c [talk] 19:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Furthermore, source [1] list "America Right to Life" not CRtL, so it would be off topic in this article anyway.- Andrew c [talk] 22:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Andrew, thank you for checking for accuracy, but the first Youtube citation is a recording of an actual news broadcast, so there should be no question of its authenticity or independence as a source. It's simply in video form, and hosted on Youtube for convenience. The second item is sourced elsewhere, and I've added two more citations, including one from a widely recognized and respected major newsmagazine with nationwide circulation. I'll add a note that both CRTL and American Right to Life hosted Power in the Park.
Rensslaer c
[talk]
18:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
The Worldmag article mentions a black pro-life event at Martin Luther King Jr. Park, and says it's right next door to the abortion center. That information alone should be sufficient to establish it's talking about the same event referenced.
As for American Right to Life, it was founded by Colorado Right to Life, and should have its own article on Wikipedia, it just doesn't yet. Any efforts by ARTL in Colorado are generally and by definition done through their affiliate, Colorado Right to Life, though they use the bigger name -- American Right to Life -- to connote that it's an event with national significance.
I added more citations to try to please you -- the one citation indicates the event happened, the other citation indicates more detail on what the event was, and the video provides on-the-spot verification of what was said.
Do you have a reference that Youtube is not considered valid for any reason? I read through the rules yesterday and I certainly did not see that. Youtube is a video reference service where you can see stuff that actually happened, and as far as I know it's the only streamable place where you can still view the 9News media coverage. If I need to cite a news source for verification, why not cite their actual streamable video, no matter the source? You're not suggesting it's faked, surely. Rensslaer ( talk) 20:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)