Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. I have made some copy editing changes. Please feel free to revert any with which you do not agree. The episode is very interesting because of all the cultural tie-ins. At this time, I think the article is fine. I am unclear about the status of the images. The one Fair use is justified, I believe. What about the images of the writers, since they are still alive?

I especially want to make sure that the copy editing changes I made are ok.

— Mattisse ( Talk) 23:55, 14 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I just looked at the copyedits you made and all of them are great. The images of Groening, Jean and the Carpenters are all free-use so there shouldn't be any problem with using them. Thanks for taking a look and reviewing the article! :) TheLeft orium 10:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): Clearly written b ( MoS): Follows relevant MoS guidelines

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): Reliable sources c ( OR): No OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): Cover broad contextual aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Neutral

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.: Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations!

— Mattisse ( Talk) 14:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC) reply