A fact from ColombiaâIndia relations appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 December 2007, and was viewed approximately 1,017 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been renamed from Indo-Colombian relations to Colombia-India relations as the result of a move request.
The result of the proposal was - move to reverse previous page move as unopposed and more neutral title. Keith D ( talk) 11:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Someone change it without proposing it at the talk... I think is more neutral to keep the actual name of the countries and by alphabetical order.-- Zer0~Gravity (Roger - Out) 23:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Gross violation of Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations guidelines. All bilateral relations articles involving India, with the exception of few, are named Indo-XXX relations. Using 'Indo' is similar to using 'Anglo', 'Franco' and 'Sino'. I'm reverting the move. If someone disagrees, please change the title of Sino-Australian relations, Sino-American relations and numerous other articles. -- AI009 ( talk) 11:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Apparently you did not read this:
READ Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations There are special adjectives that are to be used. Exceptions may be permitted if the name doesn't phonetically sound correct.
Does it sound correct? no, using Colombia-India avoids the impression that we are talking about Colombian relations with their indigenous population. -- Zer0~Gravity (Roger - Out) 10:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
In latinamerica the term Indians is still used to refer to Native Americans.. watch your typing on calling people ignorant.. it may haunt you back-- Zer0~Gravity (Roger - Out) 10:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was No consensus. Discussion here and above show no consensus. There is also no clear pattern when I look through related categories. â Wknight94 ( talk) 00:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Colombia-India relations â Indo-Colombian relations â 1) Read Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations guidelines. 2)Maintain uniformity among India-related bilateral relation articles 3)No balanced view was sought before previous "consensus" was achieved. 4)Have cited other reasons above. -- AI009 ( talk) 07:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ColombiaâIndia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
A fact from ColombiaâIndia relations appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 December 2007, and was viewed approximately 1,017 times (
disclaimer) (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been renamed from Indo-Colombian relations to Colombia-India relations as the result of a move request.
The result of the proposal was - move to reverse previous page move as unopposed and more neutral title. Keith D ( talk) 11:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Someone change it without proposing it at the talk... I think is more neutral to keep the actual name of the countries and by alphabetical order.-- Zer0~Gravity (Roger - Out) 23:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Gross violation of Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations guidelines. All bilateral relations articles involving India, with the exception of few, are named Indo-XXX relations. Using 'Indo' is similar to using 'Anglo', 'Franco' and 'Sino'. I'm reverting the move. If someone disagrees, please change the title of Sino-Australian relations, Sino-American relations and numerous other articles. -- AI009 ( talk) 11:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Apparently you did not read this:
READ Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations There are special adjectives that are to be used. Exceptions may be permitted if the name doesn't phonetically sound correct.
Does it sound correct? no, using Colombia-India avoids the impression that we are talking about Colombian relations with their indigenous population. -- Zer0~Gravity (Roger - Out) 10:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
In latinamerica the term Indians is still used to refer to Native Americans.. watch your typing on calling people ignorant.. it may haunt you back-- Zer0~Gravity (Roger - Out) 10:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was No consensus. Discussion here and above show no consensus. There is also no clear pattern when I look through related categories. â Wknight94 ( talk) 00:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Colombia-India relations â Indo-Colombian relations â 1) Read Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations guidelines. 2)Maintain uniformity among India-related bilateral relation articles 3)No balanced view was sought before previous "consensus" was achieved. 4)Have cited other reasons above. -- AI009 ( talk) 07:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
*'''Support'''
or *'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with ~~~~
. Since
polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account
Wikipedia's naming conventions.Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ColombiaâIndia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:31, 10 August 2017 (UTC)