Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 ( talk · contribs) 00:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC) reply

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: Passed-- ¿3fam ily6 _contribs 12:58, 14 June 2014 (UTC) reply

   Pass/Fail:

• There is a citation needed tag in the paragraph dealing with the Rus campaign under the "Expansion, internal conflicts and legislation (1096–1105)" section.-- ¿3fam ily6 _contribs 00:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC) reply

• Image tagging issue

Sorry, I did not notice this before, but the following images are tagged as needing a US public domain tag: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].

3family6, thank for your review. I fixed the citation. However, I am not an expert in the field of US copyright laws, so I cannot fix the issue regarding the pictures' copyright position in the US. Borsoka ( talk) 06:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Looking at the information, the illustrations should easily be in US public domain, since they are centuries old. Therefore, I think it would be okay if I went ahead and added the tag.-- ¿3fam ily6 _contribs 12:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC) reply