![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
user:Knordlun asked for a rational for the C-class rating of this article. For reference her are the criteria for B-class:
B |
|
Alhtough the article is fairly close to B-class it does not quite meet all the B-class criteria, and thus must rated as C-class. TimothyRias ( talk) 13:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
I propose that Particle shower be merged into collision cascade. They appear to describe the same thing. -- Yannick ( talk) 01:41, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
I would not agree -- collision cascade is used specifically to denote collisions among atoms/ions inside a solid, while a particle shower is used for collisions of mostly electrons and gamma particles in a gas. The physics behind the two phenomena is very different, both because the interactions are and the collisional nature (former is binary collisions, latter often many-body collisions). 91.153.142.82 ( talk) 18:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I also consider the two phenomena as almost fundamentally different. Collision cascades in most cases don't lead to the conversion of energy to matter, while it is the underlying principle of particle showers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.193.107.99 ( talk) 11:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Collision cascade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
user:Knordlun asked for a rational for the C-class rating of this article. For reference her are the criteria for B-class:
B |
|
Alhtough the article is fairly close to B-class it does not quite meet all the B-class criteria, and thus must rated as C-class. TimothyRias ( talk) 13:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
I propose that Particle shower be merged into collision cascade. They appear to describe the same thing. -- Yannick ( talk) 01:41, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
I would not agree -- collision cascade is used specifically to denote collisions among atoms/ions inside a solid, while a particle shower is used for collisions of mostly electrons and gamma particles in a gas. The physics behind the two phenomena is very different, both because the interactions are and the collisional nature (former is binary collisions, latter often many-body collisions). 91.153.142.82 ( talk) 18:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
I also consider the two phenomena as almost fundamentally different. Collision cascades in most cases don't lead to the conversion of energy to matter, while it is the underlying principle of particle showers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.193.107.99 ( talk) 11:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Collision cascade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)