![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Coldplay, despite all the people clamoring that they are pop, are indeed still Alternative Rock. Alternative music is intended to be directed towards a different audience than "mainstream" music-which still holds true of Coldplay. The label "alternative" has little do with the actual content of of the music and the intended target audience. Perhaps they should begin to be labelled as "Alternative pop" for appealing to an alternative demographic while incorporating elements of pop music into their music. While brousing sources used by people to verify their claims of Coldplay being pop, I often find that the source are not talking about pop the genre, but rather pop, the term used to describe any music currntly popular. Yes, there is a difference! If you actually want to look at their discography, it is quite evident that they remain largely an alternative rock band with pop rock and pop influences. All of their studio releases from 2000-2008 would fit under any music scholar's definition of rock music. Mylo Xyoloto remains largely a rock album, with alternative songs such as Hurts Like Heaven, Major Minus and Up with the Birds overhsadowing what some might label as "pop", Paradise and Princess of China. Ghost Stories was a largely ambient and pop-rock album, and AHFOD maintains strong rock elements in songs such as Up&Up and the title track. Based on my reasoning in this paragraph, I see absolutely no reason to label Coldplay as "pop."
64.53.130.73 ( talk) 01:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Head Full of Dreams (song). --- Another Believer ( Talk) 17:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Coldplay has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Subsection title 1.3, entitled "A Rush of Blood to the Head amd superstardom (2001–04)", includes the word "and" misspelled as "amd".
Thomas.w.noonan ( talk) 17:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
How is this note even allowed? They were formed in London and they're English. British could mean Scottish, which is why it should say "English". -- HughMorris15 ( talk) 08:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
The article has a number of inaccuracies regarding "Trouble". It says that it was released as a limited edition, and that the CD included a remix of "Yellow". In fact the limited edition CD was the remix of "Yellow" with "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas", as is clearly stated in the cited source. "Trouble" had a full release in both the UK and the US. Also, the statement that it and "Yellow" had regular radio airplay in the UK and US, while undoubtedly true, is not supported by the cited source. I am editing the paragraph accordingly. Scolaire ( talk) 13:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Coldplay has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change, "After they formed under the name Pectoralz, Guy Berryman joined the group as a bassist and they changed their name to Starfish" to "The band originally formed under the name Starfish. In the early days, during rehearsals, they became spoof alter ego boy band Pectoralz but this was never a serious venture - just for fun. Guy Berryman joined the group as bassist". 94.174.68.119 ( talk) 12:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Phil Harvey has been removed from the list of the band's lineup. At least one user has requested that this matter be taken up here and consensus reached under WP:BRD. I personallvingry feel that this is blatant evidence of what needs to be done, but what do others think? Rovingrobert ( talk) 08:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Coldplay has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first line should read "Coldplay is a..." rather than "Coldplay are a...".
45.46.87.224 (
talk)
04:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Chris confirmed in a interview that a new EP will be released, titled Kaleidoscope https://twitter.com/coldplay/status/800739286807171072 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewfer5 ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
It should be noted that the band Coldplay has no problems performing under the rule of military juntas/ dictatorships. They have just announced a concert in Bangkok, Thailand which is presently under a military dictatorship. Presently hundreds of people are facing trials under the Thai military junta and for criticizing the Thai royals. One many faces a trial for insulting the former king's pet dog.It might be worth creating a list of bands on Wikipedia who are willing to work with Dictators, abusive royals and other fascists. I'm sure there are many. NaturalEquality ( talk) 03:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Coldplay has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
They did a collaboration with The Chainsmokers. 178.164.120.90 ( talk) 17:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
As evidenced by its Bangkok show yesterday, it can be noted that Coldplay is willing to play under regimes such military juntas. I'm sure there are many performers who do this but it is a fact that not all are willing to do business in nations whose people lack free speech and human rights. NaturalEquality ( talk) 02:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
British rock should be changed to English rock.
97.87.240.178 ( talk) 18:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
British rock should be changed to English rock as most articles on bands from England have it that way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dean12065 ( talk • contribs) 23:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Dean12065 ( talk) 23:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
As part of Wikiproject Userbox, I have added Template: User ColdPlay to the bands area. Feel free to use. Tim Quievryn
In case there are any misconceptions, the concert slated as being a DVD release earlier in the year has been shown on BOTH SPANISH AND CANADIAN TELEVISION. Somebody is continually deleting my alterations even though it WAS DEFINITELY shown on Spanish television, according to the official website.
Whoever wrote this is an idiot. It was never aired on Spanish television according to the band manager.
...which read:
contain information other than what appears in reference 7, which focuses on artist departures from the EMI label, and on speculation as to whether Coldplay would renew with EMI at a particular point in their history. (Martin meeting Rice-Oxley, weekend on Virgina Water, M's invitation to R-O to join Coldplay, R-O's decline of invitation and its relation to Keane—essentially none of these BLP facts are supported by the given reference.)
As well, the closing sentence, and in particular, the phrase "this event would shape the second line-up of Keane" has no clear meaning as it stands (what is a "second line-up"?), and is also not supported by the citation given. As such, tag placed and this note added. Sincerely, a music apprec. prof.
Shouldn't we put in the recent festivals coldplay played at? This includes Concert4 CVille
This article could explain how they got the name "Coldplay". I do not know myself, I just thought it would be interesting if any one who does know put this in the article. Vorbee ( talk) 16:55, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Is there a reason why British rock can't be changed to English rock? Coldplay are a band from England, so does that make them an English rock band? What prevents my change to change British rock to English rock?
Dean12065 ( talk) 22:11, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Why are Coldplay listed as a 'British rock band' whereas others such as Radiohead are listed as an 'English rock band' on their page. Surely this is an inconsistency? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.177.223 ( talk) 22:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Why is there images of various logos on Coldplay's Wikipedia article? If the band is switching between types of logos, shouldn't there be no logo images on the article? May I delete them? Dean12065 ( talk) 23:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Why did the page say "Coldplay are a British rock band" instead of "Coldplay is a British rock band"? I don’t know why it says are, not is. Bfdi1234 ( talk) 19:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
There should be a timeline within the "Band members" section in the article. Dean12065 ( talk) 14:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
I agree, I looked into creating the PGN for Coldplay but couldn't quite figure out how to create it and apply it to their main page- I have the code edited for Coldplay here. Code template borrowed from other band pages. AvocetWing ( talk) 17:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
For a long time, the infobox image of the article was the one on the left, but at some point, it was changed to the one on the right.
The image on the right is certainly serviceable and shows all the band members well enough, but to me, it's not a very interesting image. The shot of the band performing is much more visually appealing. It's an action shot, shows the lighting/visual effects of the band's show, and depicts the band members in their roles with their primary instruments. If given the choice between a performance image and a curtain call image at comparable zoom levels, I would almost always prefer to see a performance image. And from a photographic perspective, the left image is better compositionally and technically. I would like to see if others agree with me about changing the image back. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 ( talk • contributions) 04:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
How is it any more difficult to identify the band members in the left image? You can see each of them in the image at a standard thumbnail size (and even more so at the larger thumbnail size when used in an infobox), and you have the added benefit of seeing them perform their instruments, which to me, is a much contextually relevant detail than how large their faces are in the image. The image on the right just strikes me as something you would not use in an encyclopedia unless there were no other options to consider. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 ( talk • contributions) 14:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
I’ve noticed that the logos between eras have been removed. Why were they removed and was consensus established beforehand? Paul Webb (PaulWebbtheTechExpert) ( talk) 14:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
My first thought was that it was because of some copyright issue, but then I saw one of the sections above, where someone said that the band has no official logo and that the logos therefore should have been removed. Personally, I don't think it was a good idea to remove the logos. Even if none of them were ever a permanent thing, they still represent Coldplay's history and stylistic evolution, and that one logo that they had at the beginning, which was written in Albertus, had been used from the very beginning of the band up until the band's fourth album, so it actually became somewhat iconic. Considering how much and how long that one logo was used, I think it might have actually been planned to be the band's permanent or at least semi-permanent logo until Viva la Vida came along and the band decided to change their logo for each album going forward. It's also worth noting that each of the old logos are still being used in merchandise associated with their respective albums. 2601:58D:301:C060:592D:F5C6:8090:62E4 ( talk) 15:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
I would like to change their current photo to this one, it is newer and you can see all the members much better. One might argue that they're not playing instruments on it, but neither are The Beatles or Radiohead on the introduction photo of their featured articles. As for Phil Harvey's function, he branded himself as co-manager of the band on a TikTok comment posted today, and it's not the first time actually. Should we just remove the "(1998–2002)" part? -- GustavoCza ( talk) 07:51, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm not going anywhere so you're going to have to just tough it out. Here's a good place to explain each of my edits and if you have objections hash them out. You're not even using good grammar in your edit summaries. Justanother2 ( talk) 11:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
You are not listening. Their, I meant not the for examinations. I showed you some mistakes. It says Will was briefly fired, then Chris had kicked him out and felt badly. That's being repetitious. If you want to show me some of the edits you aren't agreeing with we could look at those. Justanother2 ( talk) 11:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
I don't care how it's worded; I am changing the grammar when it is wrong. Justanother2 ( talk) 12:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
I think it fits them better since it would encompass both alternative rock and alternative pop which are their main genres. GustavoCza ( talk) 16:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey guys. As this is one of a few points of contention when it comes to this band/article and the people who regularly edit this article are different from those who regularly edited the article back in 2009, I figured it might be worth revisiting the topic of this discussion and seeing what people think/if anyone wants to come up with a new consensus. GustavoCza believes that the band's nationality should be British, their first revert indicating that it's because of a couple of members' nationalities; I believe that it should be English, as the band was formed/is based in England, most of the members are English and it would be consistent with other English bands such as The Beatles, Oasis, Tears for Fears, Whitesnake, Black Sabbath, even DragonForce (who have had a lot of different nationalities), but understand why the original consensus was to leave the nationality out altogether. Keen to get some thoughts – thanks. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 13:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
I removed the name from their Info Box a while ago but here's the proper source now, the previous ones were taken from Twitter and the Coldplaying Forum: https://web.archive.org/web/20090426025721/http://www.coldplay.com/oracledetail.php?id=643&page=0 GustavoCza ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm not an expert on this but it seems that usually an upcoming album is included in the discography only when its title is officially confirmed and the release date has been established. Is it like that or am I wrong?
I ask this because the inclusion of Moon Music in the discography, despite having a source, does not seem very encyclopedic or notable, given that it was only mentioned in an interview. As far as we know we are not even sure of the title, it might actually be "Music of the Spheres vol. II, Moon Music" or something similar.
I don't know much about discography rules, I'm just asking! FilBenLeafBoy ( talk) 14:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Why is the band's so-called polarising effect listed ahead of its success? Billsmith60 ( talk) 19:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
References
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Coldplay, despite all the people clamoring that they are pop, are indeed still Alternative Rock. Alternative music is intended to be directed towards a different audience than "mainstream" music-which still holds true of Coldplay. The label "alternative" has little do with the actual content of of the music and the intended target audience. Perhaps they should begin to be labelled as "Alternative pop" for appealing to an alternative demographic while incorporating elements of pop music into their music. While brousing sources used by people to verify their claims of Coldplay being pop, I often find that the source are not talking about pop the genre, but rather pop, the term used to describe any music currntly popular. Yes, there is a difference! If you actually want to look at their discography, it is quite evident that they remain largely an alternative rock band with pop rock and pop influences. All of their studio releases from 2000-2008 would fit under any music scholar's definition of rock music. Mylo Xyoloto remains largely a rock album, with alternative songs such as Hurts Like Heaven, Major Minus and Up with the Birds overhsadowing what some might label as "pop", Paradise and Princess of China. Ghost Stories was a largely ambient and pop-rock album, and AHFOD maintains strong rock elements in songs such as Up&Up and the title track. Based on my reasoning in this paragraph, I see absolutely no reason to label Coldplay as "pop."
64.53.130.73 ( talk) 01:59, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Head Full of Dreams (song). --- Another Believer ( Talk) 17:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Coldplay has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Subsection title 1.3, entitled "A Rush of Blood to the Head amd superstardom (2001–04)", includes the word "and" misspelled as "amd".
Thomas.w.noonan ( talk) 17:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
How is this note even allowed? They were formed in London and they're English. British could mean Scottish, which is why it should say "English". -- HughMorris15 ( talk) 08:21, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
The article has a number of inaccuracies regarding "Trouble". It says that it was released as a limited edition, and that the CD included a remix of "Yellow". In fact the limited edition CD was the remix of "Yellow" with "Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas", as is clearly stated in the cited source. "Trouble" had a full release in both the UK and the US. Also, the statement that it and "Yellow" had regular radio airplay in the UK and US, while undoubtedly true, is not supported by the cited source. I am editing the paragraph accordingly. Scolaire ( talk) 13:16, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Coldplay has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change, "After they formed under the name Pectoralz, Guy Berryman joined the group as a bassist and they changed their name to Starfish" to "The band originally formed under the name Starfish. In the early days, during rehearsals, they became spoof alter ego boy band Pectoralz but this was never a serious venture - just for fun. Guy Berryman joined the group as bassist". 94.174.68.119 ( talk) 12:08, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
Phil Harvey has been removed from the list of the band's lineup. At least one user has requested that this matter be taken up here and consensus reached under WP:BRD. I personallvingry feel that this is blatant evidence of what needs to be done, but what do others think? Rovingrobert ( talk) 08:43, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Coldplay has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first line should read "Coldplay is a..." rather than "Coldplay are a...".
45.46.87.224 (
talk)
04:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Chris confirmed in a interview that a new EP will be released, titled Kaleidoscope https://twitter.com/coldplay/status/800739286807171072 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drewfer5 ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
It should be noted that the band Coldplay has no problems performing under the rule of military juntas/ dictatorships. They have just announced a concert in Bangkok, Thailand which is presently under a military dictatorship. Presently hundreds of people are facing trials under the Thai military junta and for criticizing the Thai royals. One many faces a trial for insulting the former king's pet dog.It might be worth creating a list of bands on Wikipedia who are willing to work with Dictators, abusive royals and other fascists. I'm sure there are many. NaturalEquality ( talk) 03:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request to
Coldplay has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
They did a collaboration with The Chainsmokers. 178.164.120.90 ( talk) 17:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
As evidenced by its Bangkok show yesterday, it can be noted that Coldplay is willing to play under regimes such military juntas. I'm sure there are many performers who do this but it is a fact that not all are willing to do business in nations whose people lack free speech and human rights. NaturalEquality ( talk) 02:06, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
British rock should be changed to English rock.
97.87.240.178 ( talk) 18:15, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
British rock should be changed to English rock as most articles on bands from England have it that way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dean12065 ( talk • contribs) 23:31, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
Dean12065 ( talk) 23:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
As part of Wikiproject Userbox, I have added Template: User ColdPlay to the bands area. Feel free to use. Tim Quievryn
In case there are any misconceptions, the concert slated as being a DVD release earlier in the year has been shown on BOTH SPANISH AND CANADIAN TELEVISION. Somebody is continually deleting my alterations even though it WAS DEFINITELY shown on Spanish television, according to the official website.
Whoever wrote this is an idiot. It was never aired on Spanish television according to the band manager.
...which read:
contain information other than what appears in reference 7, which focuses on artist departures from the EMI label, and on speculation as to whether Coldplay would renew with EMI at a particular point in their history. (Martin meeting Rice-Oxley, weekend on Virgina Water, M's invitation to R-O to join Coldplay, R-O's decline of invitation and its relation to Keane—essentially none of these BLP facts are supported by the given reference.)
As well, the closing sentence, and in particular, the phrase "this event would shape the second line-up of Keane" has no clear meaning as it stands (what is a "second line-up"?), and is also not supported by the citation given. As such, tag placed and this note added. Sincerely, a music apprec. prof.
Shouldn't we put in the recent festivals coldplay played at? This includes Concert4 CVille
This article could explain how they got the name "Coldplay". I do not know myself, I just thought it would be interesting if any one who does know put this in the article. Vorbee ( talk) 16:55, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Is there a reason why British rock can't be changed to English rock? Coldplay are a band from England, so does that make them an English rock band? What prevents my change to change British rock to English rock?
Dean12065 ( talk) 22:11, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Why are Coldplay listed as a 'British rock band' whereas others such as Radiohead are listed as an 'English rock band' on their page. Surely this is an inconsistency? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.177.223 ( talk) 22:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Why is there images of various logos on Coldplay's Wikipedia article? If the band is switching between types of logos, shouldn't there be no logo images on the article? May I delete them? Dean12065 ( talk) 23:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Why did the page say "Coldplay are a British rock band" instead of "Coldplay is a British rock band"? I don’t know why it says are, not is. Bfdi1234 ( talk) 19:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
There should be a timeline within the "Band members" section in the article. Dean12065 ( talk) 14:15, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
I agree, I looked into creating the PGN for Coldplay but couldn't quite figure out how to create it and apply it to their main page- I have the code edited for Coldplay here. Code template borrowed from other band pages. AvocetWing ( talk) 17:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
For a long time, the infobox image of the article was the one on the left, but at some point, it was changed to the one on the right.
The image on the right is certainly serviceable and shows all the band members well enough, but to me, it's not a very interesting image. The shot of the band performing is much more visually appealing. It's an action shot, shows the lighting/visual effects of the band's show, and depicts the band members in their roles with their primary instruments. If given the choice between a performance image and a curtain call image at comparable zoom levels, I would almost always prefer to see a performance image. And from a photographic perspective, the left image is better compositionally and technically. I would like to see if others agree with me about changing the image back. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 ( talk • contributions) 04:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
How is it any more difficult to identify the band members in the left image? You can see each of them in the image at a standard thumbnail size (and even more so at the larger thumbnail size when used in an infobox), and you have the added benefit of seeing them perform their instruments, which to me, is a much contextually relevant detail than how large their faces are in the image. The image on the right just strikes me as something you would not use in an encyclopedia unless there were no other options to consider. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 ( talk • contributions) 14:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
I’ve noticed that the logos between eras have been removed. Why were they removed and was consensus established beforehand? Paul Webb (PaulWebbtheTechExpert) ( talk) 14:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
My first thought was that it was because of some copyright issue, but then I saw one of the sections above, where someone said that the band has no official logo and that the logos therefore should have been removed. Personally, I don't think it was a good idea to remove the logos. Even if none of them were ever a permanent thing, they still represent Coldplay's history and stylistic evolution, and that one logo that they had at the beginning, which was written in Albertus, had been used from the very beginning of the band up until the band's fourth album, so it actually became somewhat iconic. Considering how much and how long that one logo was used, I think it might have actually been planned to be the band's permanent or at least semi-permanent logo until Viva la Vida came along and the band decided to change their logo for each album going forward. It's also worth noting that each of the old logos are still being used in merchandise associated with their respective albums. 2601:58D:301:C060:592D:F5C6:8090:62E4 ( talk) 15:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
I would like to change their current photo to this one, it is newer and you can see all the members much better. One might argue that they're not playing instruments on it, but neither are The Beatles or Radiohead on the introduction photo of their featured articles. As for Phil Harvey's function, he branded himself as co-manager of the band on a TikTok comment posted today, and it's not the first time actually. Should we just remove the "(1998–2002)" part? -- GustavoCza ( talk) 07:51, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm not going anywhere so you're going to have to just tough it out. Here's a good place to explain each of my edits and if you have objections hash them out. You're not even using good grammar in your edit summaries. Justanother2 ( talk) 11:29, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
You are not listening. Their, I meant not the for examinations. I showed you some mistakes. It says Will was briefly fired, then Chris had kicked him out and felt badly. That's being repetitious. If you want to show me some of the edits you aren't agreeing with we could look at those. Justanother2 ( talk) 11:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
I don't care how it's worded; I am changing the grammar when it is wrong. Justanother2 ( talk) 12:24, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
I think it fits them better since it would encompass both alternative rock and alternative pop which are their main genres. GustavoCza ( talk) 16:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey guys. As this is one of a few points of contention when it comes to this band/article and the people who regularly edit this article are different from those who regularly edited the article back in 2009, I figured it might be worth revisiting the topic of this discussion and seeing what people think/if anyone wants to come up with a new consensus. GustavoCza believes that the band's nationality should be British, their first revert indicating that it's because of a couple of members' nationalities; I believe that it should be English, as the band was formed/is based in England, most of the members are English and it would be consistent with other English bands such as The Beatles, Oasis, Tears for Fears, Whitesnake, Black Sabbath, even DragonForce (who have had a lot of different nationalities), but understand why the original consensus was to leave the nationality out altogether. Keen to get some thoughts – thanks. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 13:50, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
I removed the name from their Info Box a while ago but here's the proper source now, the previous ones were taken from Twitter and the Coldplaying Forum: https://web.archive.org/web/20090426025721/http://www.coldplay.com/oracledetail.php?id=643&page=0 GustavoCza ( talk • contribs) 20:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm not an expert on this but it seems that usually an upcoming album is included in the discography only when its title is officially confirmed and the release date has been established. Is it like that or am I wrong?
I ask this because the inclusion of Moon Music in the discography, despite having a source, does not seem very encyclopedic or notable, given that it was only mentioned in an interview. As far as we know we are not even sure of the title, it might actually be "Music of the Spheres vol. II, Moon Music" or something similar.
I don't know much about discography rules, I'm just asking! FilBenLeafBoy ( talk) 14:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Why is the band's so-called polarising effect listed ahead of its success? Billsmith60 ( talk) 19:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
References