 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 July 2021. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
I propose merging this into Triple parentheses. The two articles are almost the same '''tAD''' ( talk) 05:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- This was before I saw the recent expansion, but the brief existence of the app is notable as part of this phenomenon, and this phenomenon is most noted for this app. '''tAD''' ( talk) 05:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed. I think since we both are the creators of the pages in question, I think other editors should also chip in. Best, Nairspecht Converse 05:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Merge I wholeheartedly agree with The Almightey Drill. This article could neatly fit into a section of its own in Triple parentheses. Do we need to add the {{ merge}} template? — Gorthian ( talk) 19:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- It got prodded, so I swapped out the {{ prod}} for {{ merge to}}. — Gorthian ( talk) 20:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- If everybody thinks that this should have a separate section on triple parentheses, then it's okay. Let's do it. However, I would request the editor to put this under a sub-section and not inside a paragraph. It's tad notable for that at least. Cheers, Nairspecht Converse 05:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I've now merged this article into triple parentheses, in a subsection of its own as requested above. It's clear that this now-defunct add-in has no independent notability, other than having been a part of the triple parentheses phenomenon, and the treatment there now subsumes everything notable that was in this article. Note that I've removed one paragraph from this article completely; it was an extended, unsourced quote. -- The Anome ( talk) 12:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Cheers, Mr. Nair Talk 12:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 12 July 2021. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
I propose merging this into Triple parentheses. The two articles are almost the same '''tAD''' ( talk) 05:52, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- This was before I saw the recent expansion, but the brief existence of the app is notable as part of this phenomenon, and this phenomenon is most noted for this app. '''tAD''' ( talk) 05:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed. I think since we both are the creators of the pages in question, I think other editors should also chip in. Best, Nairspecht Converse 05:59, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- Merge I wholeheartedly agree with The Almightey Drill. This article could neatly fit into a section of its own in Triple parentheses. Do we need to add the {{ merge}} template? — Gorthian ( talk) 19:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- It got prodded, so I swapped out the {{ prod}} for {{ merge to}}. — Gorthian ( talk) 20:15, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
- If everybody thinks that this should have a separate section on triple parentheses, then it's okay. Let's do it. However, I would request the editor to put this under a sub-section and not inside a paragraph. It's tad notable for that at least. Cheers, Nairspecht Converse 05:42, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
I've now merged this article into triple parentheses, in a subsection of its own as requested above. It's clear that this now-defunct add-in has no independent notability, other than having been a part of the triple parentheses phenomenon, and the treatment there now subsumes everything notable that was in this article. Note that I've removed one paragraph from this article completely; it was an extended, unsourced quote. -- The Anome ( talk) 12:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
- Cheers, Mr. Nair Talk 12:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)