![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Any ideas on finding further inforamtion on cognitive robotics? -- kanzure 04:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
My understanding of cognitive robotics, and I added this to the main page, was that it draws upon human psychological principles as a starting point for algorithm development and makes a point of NOT using some of the more traditional AI approaches to memory storage and knowledge representation. So, for example, memory decay might seem to some robotics researchers as a problem, or a poor system design, but it would be embraced by cognitive roboticits as an essential component of the robotics system since it is an essential component of the human cognitive system. Doghouseman 21:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted the redirect. If anything, it should not redirect to Strong AI, which takes you to a wanm debate on the definition of intelligence. While the title might be deceiving, the definition indicates something far from speculative: the creation of continuously and autonomously learning, interactively exploring and adapting, physical real-world robots. This is an engineering science, a progressive modern outflow of the long time established field of cybernetics, focusing on adaptability. -- moxon 17:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Which are the relations with developmental robotics and evolutionary robotics?. Concepts are better drawn when one can see the differences with related ones-- Altermike 07:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
In section "Other Architectures" it read: "What is needed is a magical hack that somehow translates the world into symbols." This sounds awfully biased and needs a citation maybe? I replaced the magical hack part with "needs a way to", but the sentence is still out of place, and the wording gives the impression of a personal opinion. ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.149.232.36 ( talk) 09:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Cognitive robotics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
@ BettyJacksonNY: I don't understand this cleanup message: in what way is this article biased? Jarble ( talk) 19:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Soft war kake bole 2409:4060:2D38:BFB6:0:0:44B:DB11 ( talk) 17:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
What a softwar 2409:4060:2D38:BFB6:0:0:44B:DB11 ( talk) 17:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Any ideas on finding further inforamtion on cognitive robotics? -- kanzure 04:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
My understanding of cognitive robotics, and I added this to the main page, was that it draws upon human psychological principles as a starting point for algorithm development and makes a point of NOT using some of the more traditional AI approaches to memory storage and knowledge representation. So, for example, memory decay might seem to some robotics researchers as a problem, or a poor system design, but it would be embraced by cognitive roboticits as an essential component of the robotics system since it is an essential component of the human cognitive system. Doghouseman 21:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
I have reverted the redirect. If anything, it should not redirect to Strong AI, which takes you to a wanm debate on the definition of intelligence. While the title might be deceiving, the definition indicates something far from speculative: the creation of continuously and autonomously learning, interactively exploring and adapting, physical real-world robots. This is an engineering science, a progressive modern outflow of the long time established field of cybernetics, focusing on adaptability. -- moxon 17:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Which are the relations with developmental robotics and evolutionary robotics?. Concepts are better drawn when one can see the differences with related ones-- Altermike 07:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
In section "Other Architectures" it read: "What is needed is a magical hack that somehow translates the world into symbols." This sounds awfully biased and needs a citation maybe? I replaced the magical hack part with "needs a way to", but the sentence is still out of place, and the wording gives the impression of a personal opinion. ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.149.232.36 ( talk) 09:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Cognitive robotics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:27, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
@ BettyJacksonNY: I don't understand this cleanup message: in what way is this article biased? Jarble ( talk) 19:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Soft war kake bole 2409:4060:2D38:BFB6:0:0:44B:DB11 ( talk) 17:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
What a softwar 2409:4060:2D38:BFB6:0:0:44B:DB11 ( talk) 17:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)