![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PaUZz LYte has repeately removed content claiming that it is sourced to Wikipedia rather than the actual source cited in the article. The source is clearly cited in the article to the Constitution of Athen. Sundayclose ( talk) 13:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Sundayclose has repeatedly added content claiming that it is properly sourced and has been warned several times as to why and how that's not legitimate and doesnt live up to Wikipedia's standards to make such a claim. PaUZz LYte ( talk) 13:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
@ PaUZz LYte: From the actual source (which is not a Wikipedia article), page 6: "Medon was the son and successor of Codrus". If you want to challenge whether Artistotle was the actual author of the source, that is an entirely different matter which does not justify removing all of the content. You need to restore the content (which is the WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS), then bring your concerns about authorship here rather than edit warring. Sundayclose ( talk) 14:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
@ Sundayclose provide the quotation in your newly provided evidence that states it was "possibly" one of Aristotles students that made the claim as well as the claim your making that the student had an "alternative view" of some sort. PaUZz LYte ( talk) 20:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
@ Sundayclose PaUZz LYte ( talk) 21:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
PaUZz LYte has repeately removed content claiming that it is sourced to Wikipedia rather than the actual source cited in the article. The source is clearly cited in the article to the Constitution of Athen. Sundayclose ( talk) 13:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Sundayclose has repeatedly added content claiming that it is properly sourced and has been warned several times as to why and how that's not legitimate and doesnt live up to Wikipedia's standards to make such a claim. PaUZz LYte ( talk) 13:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
@ PaUZz LYte: From the actual source (which is not a Wikipedia article), page 6: "Medon was the son and successor of Codrus". If you want to challenge whether Artistotle was the actual author of the source, that is an entirely different matter which does not justify removing all of the content. You need to restore the content (which is the WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS), then bring your concerns about authorship here rather than edit warring. Sundayclose ( talk) 14:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
@ Sundayclose provide the quotation in your newly provided evidence that states it was "possibly" one of Aristotles students that made the claim as well as the claim your making that the student had an "alternative view" of some sort. PaUZz LYte ( talk) 20:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
@ Sundayclose PaUZz LYte ( talk) 21:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)